Antibiotic therapy for ulcerative colitis: Time for reevaluation?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ohkusa T, Kato K, Terao S, et al. Newly developed antibiotic combination therapy for ulcerative colitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:1820–1829. Fusiobacterium varium has been identified in the colonic mucosa of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients1 and a product of this organism, butyric acid, causes UC-like lesions in mice.2 These observations provided the rationale for a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial by Ohkusa et al3 to evaluate combination antibiotic therapy targeting F. varium eradication for induction and maintenance of remission in active UC. Patients with chronic relapsing mild-to-severe relapsing UC were randomly assigned to oral amoxicillin 1500 mg/day, tetracycline 1500 mg/day, and metronidazole 750 mg/day (ATM, n = 105) versus placebo (n = 101) for 2 weeks. These antibiotics were chosen on the basis of F. varium susceptibility testing. The primary study endpoint was clinical response (decrease from baseline Mayo score at 3 months after treatment completion); secondary endpoints included clinical and endoscopic score improvements at 12 months. Concomitant oral or rectal medications for UC were not discontinued except for corticosteroids, which were tapered after week 8 until discontinuation. Corticosteroid discontinuation for ≥3 months in steroid-dependent patients was considered steroid withdrawal. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups and 48% of patients were corticosteroid-dependent. The median Mayo score for each group was 6 (range: 2–12); 51 placebo and 65 ATM patients had moderately active UC (Mayo score ≥6). The rate of response at 3 months after treatment was greater with ATM than with placebo (44.8% versus 22.8%, P = 0.0011) and correlated with improvement in endoscopic scores (P = 0.002). However, at 3 months rates of remission were similar after ATM and placebo (19.0% versus 15.8%, P = 0.59). At 12 months the clinical response remained higher with ATM compared with placebo (49.5% versus 21.8%, P < 0.0001) and remission rates increased to 26.7% with ATM compared with 14.9% for placebo (P = 0.041). Endoscopic scores also were improved after ATM treatment compared with placebo (P = 0.002). At 12 months, 50 ATM and 61 placebo patients had withdrawn, predominately due to disease relapse. For patients completing the trial the rate of clinical remission with discontinuation of steroids was higher in the ATM group than placebo (34.7% versus 13.7%; P = 0.019). Subset analyses of patients with active UC (Mayo scores of 6–12) showed a higher rate of response and mucosal healing at 3 and 12 months with ATM than placebo; no differences were identified for patients with inactive UC (Mayo score <6). No serious drug-related toxicities were observed, including the absence of enteric pathogens. Before treatment, baseline titers of immunoglobulins to F. varium were similar in the two groups. Among patients positive for F. varium antibodies, clinical response rates were higher in the ATM than in the placebo group at 3 months (45.5% versus 21.1%, P = 0.0023) and at 12 months (48.5% versus 18.4%, P < 0.0001). F. varium antibody titers decreased in responders but not in nonresponders. The authors concluded that for patients with active UC 2-week triple antibiotic therapy achieved clinical improvement, remission, and steroid withdrawal more effectively than placebo.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,020 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,026 | 0,040 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».