South Wales Joint Neuroscience Meeting, Bridgend, 29 April 2010: a 66-year-old man who suddenly couldn't drive
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 66-year-old man was referred by his general practitioner following an event in October 2009. During his weekly trip into town he had attempted to drive his car but found that he was unable to operate the controls. Nor could he work the gear stick, or apply or release the handbrake. His wife, who witnessed this episode, added that he was unable to navigate and to follow the route when a passenger in the car took over driving. His power, movements and speech were not affected. One hour later, after he had returned home, he was oriented in space and time but was still not felt to be back to normal in terms of speed and clarity of thought. For several weeks before this episode his wife had noticed that his concentration and ability with daily activities and domestic tasks had deteriorated. On one occasion he had forgotten to put out the recycling bin on the appointed day of the week and he forgot the usual cleaning routine at home, behaviour that was uncharacteristic. Several days before the event he had complained of a mild headache, described as an ache behind the eyes, which had been worse in the mornings. There was no history of fever, sweats, weight loss or other systemic symptoms. There was a past history of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. He was an ex-smoker with a 40 pack-year history. Initial examination revealed a blood pressure of 171/100 mm Hg but otherwise systemically he was normal. He was alert and oriented in time and place. He had normal visual acuity and eye movements. There was a left lower quadrantanopia, left-sided visual neglect and cortical sensory loss in the left hand (agraphaesthesia and astereognosis). There was no evidence of constructional or dressing apraxia or of visual agnosia. Language and other …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle