363 THE IMPACT OF MULTIPLE BIOPSIES ON ERECTILE AND VOIDING FUNCTION AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A POPULATION-BASED ASSESSMENT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized (I)1 Apr 2013363 THE IMPACT OF MULTIPLE BIOPSIES ON ERECTILE AND VOIDING FUNCTION AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A POPULATION-BASED ASSESSMENT Florian Roghmann, Vincent QH Trinh, Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin, Andreas Becker, Malek Meskawi, Al'a Abdo, Joachim Noldus, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Maxine Sun Florian RoghmannFlorian Roghmann Herne, Germany , Vincent QH TrinhVincent QH Trinh Montreal, Canada , Hugo Lavigueur-BlouinHugo Lavigueur-Blouin Montreal, Canada , Andreas BeckerAndreas Becker Hamburg, Germany , Malek MeskawiMalek Meskawi Montreal, Canada , Al'a AbdoAl'a Abdo Montreal, Canada , Joachim NoldusJoachim Noldus Herne, Germany , Pierre I KarakiewiczPierre I Karakiewicz Montreal, Canada , Quoc-Dien TrinhQuoc-Dien Trinh Montreal, Canada , and Maxine SunMaxine Sun Montreal, Canada View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1750AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES A previous study showed that a delay in radical prostatectomy (RP) after prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis is associated with worse functional outcomes postoperatively. Since delay of RP likely results in increased number of prostate biopsies (PBx), we hypothesized that increasing number of PBx prior to RP was associated with higher rates of erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence postoperatively. METHODS Overall, 10,743 men without a baseline diagnosis of ED or incontinence who underwent RP for non-metastatic clinical stage T100FB;2, low-grade PCa between years 1995 and 2005 within the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database were identified. For each patient, the number of PBx prior to RP was abstracted, and dichotomized as <2 vs. ≥2. Postoperative functional outcomes consisted of urinary incontinence and ED diagnosis/procedure. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Covariates consisted of patient age at diagnosis, race, baseline comorbidities, clinical tumor stage, year of diagnosis, Metropolitan areas, marital and socioeconomic status. RESULTS Overall, 7739 (71.8%) and 3004 (28.2%) patients had <2 or ≥2 PBx prior to RP, respectively. Patients who received ≥2 PBx prior to RP had higher rates of ED diagnosis (36.6 vs. 31.3%) and procedure (5.8 vs. 4.9%), as well as urinary incontinence diagnosis (31.4 vs. 24.8%) and procedure (24.8 vs. 18.5%, all P<0.001). After accounting for all other confounders, patients with ≥2 PBx prior to RP were respectively 20 and 10% more likely to experience an ED diagnosis and procedure postoperatively (both P≤0.01). Similarly, ≥2 PBx was associated with respectively 18 and 23% higher risk of postoperative urinary incontinence diagnosis and procedure, (both P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients who receive multiple PBx prior to RP for clinically localized PCa may be at risk of higher rates of ED and urinary incontinence postoperatively. Such concerns should be communicated to patients during counseling. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e147 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Florian Roghmann Herne, Germany More articles by this author Vincent QH Trinh Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Andreas Becker Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Malek Meskawi Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Al'a Abdo Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Joachim Noldus Herne, Germany More articles by this author Pierre I Karakiewicz Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Quoc-Dien Trinh Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Maxine Sun Montreal, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».