MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2146059050 · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2007.206

Optimization of Spectrum Sensing for Opportunistic Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks

2007· article· en· W2146059050 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCognitive radioComputer scienceSpectrum (functional analysis)Computer networkTelecommunicationsWirelessPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Motivated by the low utilization of the licensed spectrum across many frequency bands, sensing-based oppor- tunistic spectrum access has recently emerged as an alternative to the outdated exclusive spectrum access policy. Under this new paradigm, a secondary (unlicensed) user monitors a primary (licensed) frequency band for a given and opportunistically transmits if it does not detect any ongoing licensed operations. Evidently, selection of the parameters involves balanc- ing a tradeoff between the speed and the quality with which the secondary user senses the licensed band. With the average throughput as the performance criterion, we obtain the parameters so as to optimize the performance of the secondary user while providing the primary user with its desired level of interference protection. I. INTRODUCTION As evidenced by recent measurements, many frequency bands across the licensed spectrum are significantly under- utilized (1), (2). This finding suggests that the spectrum scarcity, as perceived today, is largely due to the inefficient fixed frequency allocations rather than the physical shortage of the spectrum and has led the regulatory bodies to consider the opportunistic access to the temporally/spatially unused licensed bands (a.k.a. the white spaces) as a means to improve the efficiency of spectrum usage. In the absence of cooperation or signalling between the primary licensee and the secondary users, spectrum availability for the opportunistic access may be determined by direct spectrum where the secondary user monitors a licensed band for a given sensing time and opportunistically transmits if it does not detect any ongoing licensed operations. This approach is particularly appealing due to its low deployment cost and its compatibility with legacy primary users and is being considered for inclusion in the upcoming IEEE 802.22 standard for opportunistic access to the TV spectrum (3). Due to their ability to autonomously detect and to react to the changes in the spectrum usage, secondary users equipped with the spectrum capability may be considered as a primitive form of the cognitive radio (4). Design of any scheme involves balancing a tradeoff between the quality and the speed of through an appropriate selection of the time. As we shall illustrate, in the context of spectrum sensing, may be fine- tuned to enhance the secondary users' perceived quality-of- service (QoS) as long as the regulatory constraint for the protection of the primary users against harmful interference is satisfied. In particular, we will obtain the optimum times at different stages of the spectrum to maximize the average throughput of the secondary user. In this paper, simple energy detection (a.k.a. radiometry) (5) is chosen as the underlying detection scheme. In general, when some information about the structure of the primary signal is available, ad hoc feature-detectors offer a better performance (6). We note, however, that the methodology employed in this paper may be applied to optimize different spectrum sensors once the quality is characterized in terms of the time. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The regulatory constraints on spectrum are described in the following section. Section 3 provides an overview of the energy-based spectrum sensing. The optimum times for different stages of the spectrum are derived in Section 4. Finally, this paper is concluded in Section 5.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,955
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,944

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations261
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingTravaux en français237 207