Notice bibliographique
Résumé
THOUGH WELL-EDUCATED, Geraldine Monk decided quite consciously not to let education smooth over or erase texture of her Lancashire accent and local dialect. In an interview with Leonard Schwartz, she comments that when come over to America it's not evidently clear that actually speak with a very broad northern English working-class accent. A lot of people think talk Queen's English, which amuses me greatly, and it's very very nice to be away from England, people think talk posh, which don't. I've never got rid of my accent, because realized that wanted to use it. So think in that way it's almost a political statement--that might be educated, but I'm not going to betray where come from and my class background. Monk thus creates in her work a socio-poetic soundscape where place and class and gender are matters of rhyme, quantity, pitch, and pronunciation. Both physical dimensions and mutability of as sound units are highly important in her poetic practice I do love sound of words she notes to Schwartz, the way you can manipulate them, and tie them in knots--and kind of malleability and physicality of word is very important, as well as sense of it, connotation, denotation of it Her sound ranges from musical playfulness of a piece like 'Angles (with its fractured words, percussive finale, and references to musical terms) to daily journal pieces like Sky Scrapers sequence (luxuriating in Lancashire diphthongs, speech rhythms, thick consonantal clusters, and slowed syllables) to intense, sensuous, and political articulations of Interregnum and Escafeld Hangings that grab us by neck and rattle our bones. To insist on speaking in a manner labeled accented in privileged arena of literature (traditionally open only to wealthy classes) is immediately to establish a cultural space that acknowledges social realities, including reality of gender-based or class-based marginalization and whitewashing by normative, schooled modes such as BBC or CBC or Oxbridge English. Monk's defiance has a precedent in poetry of John Keats, who as part of Cockney School of Leigh Hunt, William Hazlitt, and Percy Bysshe Shelley, was vilified for his low-birth accent and liberal politics. In whitewash of page, Keats's accent is mostly forgotten, but Monk has taken pains to score her work so that reader can't avoid it, as in lines Mary Queen of Scots banged-up in slimmer in Sheffield. // Lizzy mi Luv call off yr creepsy guards (Airport Security, Escafeld 27; see also recording on CD track 9). Or following from Katherine Hewit Replies: E was newt budda Jimmy-bum-licker. E lived down't lane in a big owse wi iz porky fatted fingers drippin rings and blottin copy after nervous copy--and for what? A right royal smile? The patronising smirk of ultimate noble birth to charm iz drab and impotent circle (Interregnum) Interregnum and Escafeld Hangings explore compellingly voices of condemned women--in first case voices of so-called witches (but actually very poor and disadvantaged people) and their associates who were hanged at Pendle Hill in 1612, and in second case voice of imprisoned Mary, Queen of Scots. By extension these texts explore condemnation of all women to second-class status; in these texts, however, women speak back to power structure that imprisons them, just as Monk's northern English dialect challenges southern English power structure represented by Queen Elizabeth II. Men and women in her cotton-mill town of Blackburn, Monk recalls, actually spoke different dialects: Generally speaking women spoke more slowly and deliberately than men because they spent their days word-miming and lip-reading in deaf-out of weaving sheds. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».