Children’s persistent lying, gender differences, and disruptive behaviours: A longitudinal perspective
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Although lying by children can be a serious problem for parents and educators, there are hardly any longitudinal data to help understand its development. The aim of this study was to understand the stability of consistent lying from 6 to 8 years of age, and its association with other behaviour problems rated concurrently and subsequently. Methods: Teachers and mothers rated lying and disruptive behaviours of a population sample of boys ( N = 549) and girls ( N = 579) for three consecutive years when the children were 6, 7, and 8. Teachers also rated children’s disruptive behaviours at ages 10 and 11. Results: Mothers tended to rate their children as lying more often than teachers did. Girls were rated by both adults and across ages, as lying less than boys. The number of consistent liars (i.e., lying according to both adults at a given age) was the same at different ages. Persistent liars (consistent liars from ages 6 to 8) were rated more disruptive concurrently and subsequently by teachers. However, their disruptive behaviours did not increase from ages 6, 7, and 8 through ages 10 and 11 compared to other groups. Conclusions: Lying is common for 6- to 8-year-old children, but more frequent for males. Frequent lying, as reported by mothers and teachers, appears to become persistent by 7 years of age. Persistent lying was concurrently associated to disruptive behaviour problems. Some patterns of lying were also predictive of increases in disruptive behaviour but this finding was inconsistent and suggested the need for further research. Future studies need also to focus on the content of the lies, and their timing, to understand their function.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle