MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2149938522 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.96.8.1855

Chemical Evolution and Origin of Nickel Sulfide Mineralizationin the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario, Canada

2001· article· en· W2149938522 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEconomic Geology · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNickelIgneous rockNickel sulfideGeochemistrySulfideGeologyMetallurgyMaterials science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Sudbury Igneous Complex is widely believed to be the result of melt generation due to meteorite impact, and the Ni and Cu ores associated with the sublayer and offsets of the complex are considered to be a consequence of this event. The noritic and granophyric rocks of the main mass have similar yet elevated ratios of large ion lithophile elements (LILE) and light rare earth elements (LREE) relative to high field strength elements (HFSE) and heavy rare earth elements (HREE). This indicates that the magma was homogenized in terms of the incompatible trace element ratios and had a large chemical and isotopic contribution from an upper crustal source. Through the mafic and felsic norite there is an upward decline in MgO (14.6–4.4 wt %) and a small increase in incompatible element abundance (Ce = 35–50 ppm). The granophyre becomes slightly more evolved from the top toward the base (MgO = 0.6–2 wt %; Ce = 90–120 ppm). Some of these variations may be due to differentiation, but we believe that the crystallization of the original melt took place from the base upward and the top downward; this implies that the melt sheet was fundamentally density stratified into noritic and granophyric layers. Estimates of the bulk composition of the melt sheet are within the range of quartz diorite from the different Sudbury offsets, and we believe that all of these rocks are the products of impact-triggered melting of upper crustal rocks of the Sudbury region. Mafic norite from the base of the Sudbury Igneous Complex has 1 to 5 modal percent pyrrhotite, plus chalcopyrite and elevated Ni (40–1,000 ppm) and Cu (40–1,140 ppm); this is overlain by felsic norite, which contains trace pyrite, and low Ni (15–40 ppm) and Cu (7–40 ppm). For a similar range of MgO, the upper portion of the felsic norite unit has 5 to 10 times lower Ni and Cu than within-plate basalts and crustal rocks. There is an increase in Ni (1–5 wt %) and Cu (1–5 wt %) tenor of sulfide toward the base of the norite sequence. The depletion of the upper part of the felsic norite in Ni, Cu, and platinum group elements (PGE) is most likely due to equilibration of the magma with magmatic sulfide and accumulation of the dense sulfide liquid to the base of the melt sheet. The parental magmas giving rise to these disseminated sulfides contained ~210 ppm Ni and 109 ppm Cu based on realistic partition coefficients and magma/sulfide ratio; the process of sublayer and offset ore formation did not entirely strip the Ni, Cu, and PGE from the main mass. About 40 percent of the total Ni-Cu-PGE inventory of the Sudbury Igneous Complex is related to quartz diorite in offset dikes and Sudbury breccia belts. The marginal sulfide-free quartz diorite of the Worthington offset has a Ni and Cu abundance that is similar to crustal rocks over the same range in MgO content (3–6 wt % MgO). We believe that the quartz diorite initially formed from an S-undersaturated magma that was injected downward away from the melt sheet. The Worthington offset quartz diorite averages 83 ppm Ni and 98 ppm Cu, which is similar to sulfide-poor quartz diorite from the other offsets (Lightfoot et al., 1997b). Saturation of the melt sheet in S was achieved shortly after the injection of the quartz diorite magmas but before the center of the offset had entirely crystallized. The presence of immense resources of magmatic sulfides in the Copper Cliff offset, with sulfide metal tenors of ~13 wt percent Cu, ~6 wt percent Ni, ~18 ppm Pt, and high Pd/Ni, indicates that these sulfides formed early and from a parental magma with a Ni/Cu ratio of ~1. The parental magma is calculated to have contained 310 ppm Ni and 311 ppm Cu, and this is not characteristic of the bulk crustal melt. Presumably density segregation accompanied or predated sulfide saturation in the melt sheet, and this mechanism provides a way to produce a more metal-rich parental magma with a Ni/Cu ~1. The formation of the geologically complex and heavily contaminated sublayer is believed to either accompany or postdate offset formation. The sublayer at the Whistle and Creighton mines occupies embayment structures at the base of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, which are directly connected to small offsets. Ores from the Creighton embayment have sulfide metal tenors of ~7 wt percent Cu, ~5 wt percent Ni, and a lower Pd/Ni than the offset ores. Calculated parental magmas would have 265 ppm Ni and 172 ppm Cu, which indicates that the metals were not all removed by the formation of offset ores. Mass-balance calculations show that there is more than enough Ni and Cu in the initial melt sheet to produce all of the known sulfide deposits at Sudbury. In this model there is no requirement for metal contributions from mantle sources or from protores. The mineral potential of offset and embayment structures appears to be empirically linked to the thickness of the overlying noritic rocks, and this is consistent with our model.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,031
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,982

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,177
Écart entre enseignants0,166 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle