RESPONSE: Re: Sex-Related Differences in Bronchial Epithelial Changes Associated With Tobacco Smoking
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There is a sex difference in the distribution of histologic subtypes of lung cancer worldwide (1). In the United States and Canada, squamous cell carcinoma accounts for approximately 37% of the lung cancers in men but only 20% of the lung cancers in women. In Europe, a similar sex difference was observed (approximately 47% in men versus 27% in women). We discussed in our previous report that “in women, the major histologic lung cancer cell type found is adenocarcinoma, whereas, until recently, in men the predominant cell type was squamous cell carcinoma… . Most adenocarcinomas arise from epithelial cells in the peripherally located bronchi, bronchioles, and alveoli that are beyond the range of an adult-size fiberoptic bronchoscope” (2). The lower prevalence of preinvasive bronchial lesions in the central airways of women (14% versus 31% in men), most of which are precursors of squamous cell carcinoma, closely reflects reality. In our updated, larger cohort of 721 smokers older than 45 years, a similar, statistically significant sex difference in the prevalence of preinvasive lesions was observed, whether we use our previous definition of preinvasive lesion or the more restrictive definition suggested by Paris et al. (Table 1). With our definition, a lower prevalence in women (odds ratio = 0.7) was also observed by Paris et al. Their results confirm our observations, although the differences that they observed did not reach statistical significance, probably because of their skewed study population and comparatively smaller sample size. Although our previous study included only healthy volunteer smokers, Paris et al. included patients with cured invasive lung cancer, patients with synchronous invasive lung cancer, and smokers who were exposed to occupational carcinogens and who had a statistically significantly higher prevalence of preinvasive lesions. By including women who had or were more prone to develop these lesions, it should not be surprising that different results are observed. Furthermore, the sex difference in the prevalence of preinvasive lesions in the central airways is not equivalent to overall cancer risk differences between men and women. In former smokers, although the cumulative lifetime risk of lung cancer does not continue to increase as it does in current smokers, a substantial risk persists in those who stop smoking after the age of 50 years (3,4). Approximately 50% of the patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer are now former smokers, many of whom had given up smoking for at least 5 years (5). Our previous observation that the prevalence of preinvasive lesions did not change substantially for more than 10 years after cessation of smoking is in keeping with this observed persistent risk. However, our data should not be interpreted as showing an equal risk between former and current smokers. With continual exposure to tobacco smoke carcinogens, the risk of lung cancer is higher for current smokers because more preinvasive lesions will form and the lesions are more likely to progress to invasive cancer. Data from a cross-sectional study such as ours are not at odds with longitudinal studies that show a lower lifetime risk of lung cancer in former smokers. In summary, we believe the relatively modest disagreements between the study by Paris et al. and ours were caused by differences in study populations and the different interpretation by Paris et al. of published reports. Sex differences in the prevalence of preinvasive bronchial lesions
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,016 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,089 | 0,040 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».