Human Givens Therapy with adolescents: A practical guide for professionals by Yvonne Yates
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Very little is known about the personal side of life with cancer for young adults.Their autobiographical accounts can offer psychologists, healthcare professionals, caregivers, relatives, and other cancer patients valuable information beyond generalized health and social science data.In Everything changes, cancer patient and writer Kairol Rosenthal provides the reader with an honest, raw, and sometimes controversial insider's view on what it is like to be diagnosed with cancer in your 20s and 30s: 'By writing this book, I inspired to rip young adult cancer patients from the confines of these limited descriptors and perceptions.I want to reveal who we really are' (p. 7).By doing so, Rosenthal documents the interviews that she had with 25 other young cancer patients throughout the United States who had invited her for conversations.They retell their stories, holding nothing back, for the benefit of the reader.In addition, Everything changes is also a guidebook, accompanying the personal quotes and vignettes from interviews with these young adult cancer patients with lots of resources, including advice how to handle the (U.S.) healthcare system or access financial assistance.Young adult cancer patients are typically at a phase in their lives when they may have just moved out from their parents, are perhaps trying to establish independence, embark on postsecondary education or a professional career, begin to look for more stable partnerships, and some may think about raising a family.Many of these steps may be tentative, mixed with fears, confusions, desires, and hopes -and are invariably torn apart by a diagnosis of cancer.This is no different for author Kairol Rosenthal herself, originally a choreographer, who was diagnosed with second-stage thyroid cancer at age 27.Writing her book several years later, she recalls with a dramatic metaphor the day when she received 'the cancer bomb in her lap', her first thought being 'I want to stay alive long enough to get a dog' (p. 2) -a figment of at least some sense of continuity and belonging in the midst of chaos.And yet, fast-forwarding to the next morning, she does not quarrel 'why me', being diagnosed at such a young age, but, aware of cancer prevalence, 'why not me?'At the time of writing her book, Rosenthal has become a fully competent advocate for young cancer adult patients.The interviewees in her book comprise young adults with a broad range of cancer diagnoses, from breast cancer to lymphoma, cervical cancer, and other cancers.All of these participants grapple with their own fears and unspeakables, such as questions about parenting, attractiveness, mortality, career aims, living with parents, and dealing with pain, but also spirituality, intimate relationships, and friends.And while the intricacies of the healthcare system may seem to be
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».