Notice bibliographique
Résumé
MOTHER MATTERS: Motherhood as Discourse and Practice Andrea O'Reilly, ed. Toronto: Association for Research on Mothering. 2004; 257pp. In the introduction to Mother Matters: Motherhood as Discourse and Practice, editor Andrea O'Reilly identifies two important and generally dissonant aspects of motherhood: the socially constructed discourse that determines what mothers should do, feel and be, and the realities that affect the practice and life experiences associated with motherhood. As she argues, the difference between what we, as mothers, ought to feel and how we actually feel powerfully determine how we think about motherhood, the experience of and the capacity of women to mother. It in the midst of this gap between discourse and practice that O'Reilly locates this book. Her purpose to construct an archeology of motherhood, to uncover from the complexity of discourse the substance and significance of motherhood (p. 12). That is, her aim to tell the experience of like it is (p. 12). The articles included in the collection are expressions of different locations within this gap between discourse and practice and reflect on the dissonance between what supposed to be and what it really is. The articles were all originally published in the Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering and deal with issues such as breast feeding and breast image, lesbian motherhood, illegitimate motherhood, black women as mothers, and work, step-mothering, grand-mothering, and the roots of black mother's history. The chapters are divided in a manner that reflect the discursive aspect of and the actual practice of mothering - the discourse/practice dichotomy that O'Reilly identifies. The first section deals with the different socially constructed that shape within a social environment. Relevant here the article by O'Reilly herself in which she deals with the discursive construction of birth as a medical event which, as she argues, impoverishes the experience of birth by emptying it of all other meaning (p. 30). As she contends, the discursive construction of birth as a medical hi-tech condition makes birth an event heavily determined by ideology. Such ideological construction, as Petra Buskens argues in her chapter on parenting, affects even subversive and practices that attempt to bring birth and back into a natural condition (p. 98). As she reflects, parenting a social invention that remains elusive for modern women (p. 99). Sheu Kendall and Keller Magenau in their chapter on lesbian and custody cases contribute to this analysis by identifying some of the hegemonic that constitute lesbian as a disease that affects not only the women involved in lesbian relationships, but specially the children growing up in those relationships. Such belief in the dysfunctional condition of lesbian results in legal practices that discriminate against lesbian mothers, denying them the right to raise and care for their children. In her article on illegitimate motherhood, Nicole Pietsch looks at illegitimate also as a discourse of deviancy. She contributes a racial analysis of that differently constructs women of colour as biologically deviant prompted to transgress rules of legitimate reproduction. As she argues, while white single viewed as an accidental and personal condition that can be cured and treated, black single mothers are seen as beyond redemption and cure due to an inherited drive to transgress sexual norms. What all the chapters in this section have in common that they concern themselves with what Gillian Ramson (p. 88) refers to as the discourses that organize how we think about and the social norms that regulate mothering activities. The second section of the book deals with the more experiential aspect of as we learn of the ways in which differently located mothers mother in relation to the master that ideologically shape motherhood. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».