Effect of intraarticular steroid injection in addition to physical modalities in osteoarthritis knee
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Context: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis accounting for about 30% of general physician visits. Intrarticular (IA) corticosteroid injections have been used for decades in clinical practice for pain relief and control of local inflammation in OA. In the present study a combined therapy of long acting intra-articular injection in addition to physical modalities of OA knee was given to find out the functional improvement and clinical outcome of the patient. Methods: It was a prospective interventional non-randomized clinical study conducted in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, from October, 2011 to March, 2012. Fifty four patients between 35 and 75 years without consideration of gender with a history of not less than three months knee pain with radiographic confirmation of primary osteoarthritis were selected purposefully. Then they were divided randomly in group A and B, having 27 patients in each group. Group A received NSAID (non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) i.e. aceclofenac 100mg twice daily for 10 days + omeprazol 20mg twice daily for 10 days + MWD (micro wave diathermy 20 minutes for 14 days. + therapeutic exercise + ADL (activities of daily living), while Group B received 80mg intraarticular triamcinolon acetonide injection once followed by NSAID i.e. aceclofenac 100mg twice daily for 10 days + omeprazol 20mg twice daily for 10 days + MWD 20 minutes for 14 days. + therapeutic exercise + ADL. In both groups the patients were observed for six weeks. Results: The mean of age of patients in group A and B were 52.33±9.62 years and 52.29±9.67 years respectively. In group A, 9 (33.3%) were male and 18 (66.7%) were female. In group B, 10 (37.0%) were male and 18 (63.0%) were female. Mean visual analogue scale (VAS) during pre treatment in group A and group B were 6.22±1.60 and 7.15±1.56 respectively. Mean range of motion (ROM) during pre treatment in group A and group B were 117.33±13.05 and 112.37±19.01 respectively. Mean time taken to walk 50 feet during pre treatment in group A and group B were 18.22±2.39 and 18.81±2.13 minutes respectively. Mean Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities (WOMAC) index in group A and group B were 60.85±15.86 and 67.33±16.33 minutes respectively. After treatment in both groups visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), time taken to walk 50 feet and Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities (WOMAC) index gradually decreased and range of motion (ROM) gradually increased, which were statistically significant. However, the study conducted with small sample size in a single centre in Dhaka city, which may not be representative for the whole country. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v23i1.22694 J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 23, No.1, April, 2014, Page 48-54
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».