Shaken baby syndrome: The implementation and evaluation of an education program for parents
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Nurses and health care professionals caring for infants in the hospital setting are responsible for educating parents regarding the care of their newborn. In addition to routine care, education about potential risks must also be addressed. One of the most devastating injuries that can occur during the first one to two years of life is Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS), a form of abusive head trauma. A study was undertaken to assess parental knowledge about SBS, precipitating factors and prevention. Development of a formal education program about SBS was initiated on the Mother Baby unit at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital (now Georgia Regents Medical Center), and was presented to all mothers with healthy full term infants, prior to their newborn’s discharge from the hospital. Mothers were given a pretest to assess knowledge of SBS followed by one-to-one teaching within 24-48 hours post-delivery. Fathers were included if present, but mothers were the target audience. Two teaching methods were utilized. Mothers were assigned on an alternating basis to either an oral presentation group, or a group that also received a video presentation. The video is produced by the National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome and is specifically targeted for the post-partum population. Although 100% of the mothers had previous knowledge of SBS, only 37% were knowledgeable about prevention measures. Follow up data was gathered through a posttest via telephone contact. Mothers were asked identical questions as on the pretest. Knowledge of behaviors to prevent SBS had increased significantly. Although data analysis did not determine if one presentation method was more effective for information recall, all mothers contacted could correctly identify prevention behaviors. Education about SBS should begin during the post-partum period, but the information should be reinforced at each well baby visit to enhance retention, and discuss infant behaviors that can precipitate abuse by any and all caregivers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».