MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W21528546

How HOLLYWOOD Movies Influence International Students to Study in the United States

2013· article· en· W21528546 sur OpenAlex
Kristy Tucciarone

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCollege and university · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInterviewHigher educationInternational educationChinaFocus groupPolitical scienceStudy abroadPsychologyPublic relationsMedical educationSociologyPedagogyMedicineLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

THIS STUDY INVESTIGATES HOW INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS PERCEIVE U.S. UNIVERSITIES AS A RESULT OF THEIR PORTRAYALS IN MOVIES THAT FEATURE HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE PLOT. THE STUDY ALSO ANALYZES WHETHER INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS ARE MORE OR LESS LIKELY TO ATTEND U.S. UNIVERSITIES AS A RESULT OF U.S. INSTITUTIONS' PORTRAYALS IN MOVIES. THE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHOD OF FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEWING WAS USED TO UNDERSTAND INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF U.S. UNIVERSITIES. RECORDED TRANSCRIPTS REVEAL THAT INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS PERCEIVE U.S. UNIVERSITIES AS OFFERING FREEDOM, LIMITED PARENTAL CONTROL, FUN, PARTIES, AND AN ACADEMIC STRUCTURE THAT INCORPORATES THE STUDENT'S VOICE. THE FINDINGS OF THIS RESEARCH WILL GUIDE ADMISSIONS OFFICERS AS THEY STRIVE TO RECRUIT AND COMMUNICATE TO INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS THE MERITS AND THE REALITIES OF STUDYING AT A COLLEGE IN THE UNITED STATES.As of November 2012, 764,495 international students were enrolled at colleges and universities in the United States-a 5.7 percent increase from 2011 (McMurtrie 2012). China, India, South Korea, Canada, Taiwan, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Vietnam, and Turkey are the top ten countries of origin of international students enrolled at u.s. universities (Institute of International Education 2010). International students benefit from studying in the United States: Doing so offers them greater work-related opportunities as well as the ability to immerse themselves in the English language, promote their understanding of culture, improve their interpersonal skills, and foster their self-identity (Trilokekar and Rasmi 2011). Often, inter- national students return home with an increased positive attitude toward the United States; this can lead to future business relationships with u.s. companies (Institute of International Education 2010).Higher education continues to be one of the nations top service-sector exports (Institute of International Edu- cation 2010), contributing nearly $21.8 billion to the u.s. economy (McMurtrie 2012). Domestic students also ben- efit from the presence of international students on u.s. campuses, as, for example, from increased diversity, which exposes them to other cultures (McMurtrie 2012), prepares them to work in a global society, and supports their de- velopment of friendships and networks that are world- wide (Nikias 2008). Studying abroad benefits international as well as domestic students. Blurring academic boundaries is key to innovation and economic growth because both elements lie in the freest possible movement of people and ideas-on campus and beyond (Wildavsky 2011). Alan Goodman, president and ceo of the Institute of International Education (2010), elaborates: Active engagement between u.s. and interna- tional students in American classrooms provides students with valuable skills that will enable them to collaborate across cultures and borders to address shared global chal- lenges in the years ahead.With more than 3,100 baccalaureate-granting institu- tions in the United States, each with its own unique pur- pose, history, student body, and faculty (Nafukho and Burnett 2002), international students seek information before deciding whether and where to study abroad. Pre- vious research suggests that social influencers play pivotal roles in international students' decisions to participate in study abroad programs. Family, peers, and institutional advisors are the three most persuasive social influencers (Trilokekar and Rasmi 2011).In addition to the influence of family, peers, and insti- tutional advisors, another entity that has the ability to in- fluence international students' awareness of study abroad programs is the mass media, including television, the In- ternet, and movies (Arenofsky 2002). Movies are the most persuasive communicators about u.s. higher education because they require intentional engagement; the viewer's attention is dedicated solely to the film on the silver screen (Vivian 2003). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,289
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,600

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle