Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Mammalian oocytes are quite special cells for many reasons, but one of their most amazing characteristics is that while in the ovary they remain blocked at diplotene of prophase one of the first meiotic division [1]. Because the oocyte can remain in this resting state in the ovary until menopause in women, the oocyte can retain this meiotic cell cycle block for more than 50 years [2]. A lot can happen in 50 years, and for that entire time in the ovary, the primordial follicle containing its primary oocyte is exposed to a wide variety of environmental conditions that have an impact on the health of the oocyte and affect its potential for fostering normal development and health of the offspring derived from it [1–4]. Our genome is constantly subject to modification by the environment [3, 4]. The environmental affect on the genome begins with gametogenesis and extends through preimplantation development, pregnancy, and postpartum development and throughout life [3, 4]. The study by Kujjo et al. entitled ‘‘RAD51 Plays a Crucial Role in Halting Cell Death Program Induced by Ionizing Radiation in Bovine Oocytes,’’ published in this issue of Biology of Reproduction, reveals to us an additional environmental factor that can influence oocyte health over time [5]. Uniquely, we have to look to outer space for the source of this environmental factor [6]. Kujjo et al. inform us that highenergy cosmic rays originating from supernovas, traveling at the speed of light, strike the earth at the rate of one cosmic ray per square centimeter per minute and can penetrate more than a mile into the earth’s crust [5]. To put this into clear terms, Kujjo et al. state that during every night’s sleep a human can expect to be bombarded with up to 1 million cosmic rays [5]. This occurrence poses a series of very interesting questions, such as: How do we prevent accumulating genomic damage from these cosmic rays? Does this type of environmental insult accumulate over time? Most importantly, are oocytes susceptible to this type of insult, and could it contribute to the decline in fertility women experience beyond the age of 35, normally well before menopause and before the absolute cessation of their reproductive function occurs? Although our exposure to cosmic rays may be increasing because of global warming and ozone depletion, all species on this planet, including humans, have nevertheless been exposed to cosmic rays for their entire history [6–8]. Therefore, what mechanisms have we evolved to minimize the damage caused by cosmic ray exposure on our reproductive cells? This is the unique and important question that Kujjo et al. explore [5]. Successful completion of this study required an international collaboration between investigators from Michigan State University; the United States National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory; Waseda University in Tokyo; the RIKEN Systems and Structural Biology Center, Yokohama, Japan; and the LARCel Programa Andaluz de Terapia Celular y Medicina Regenerativa, Sevillia, Spain [5]. The investigators contrasted the effects of radiation exposure between murine and bovine oocytes. They observed important species differences in their responses to radiation, with murine oocytes activating high levels of caspases as a prelude to necrotic death, whereas bovine oocytes activate annexin-V, cytochrome C release, and an incomplete cell death program [5]. Subsequent experiments focused on the mechanisms affecting these outcomes. It was discovered that inhibition of RAD51 or increasing caspase 3 levels before irradiation induced high levels of cytoplasmic fragmentation [5]. In contrast, microinjection of RAD51 before irradiation significantly decreased cytoplasmic fragmentation and DNA damage in oocytes [5]. The decision of the researchers to focus their studies on RAD51 was quite intuitive. Although DNA double-strand breaks (DDSBs) are detrimental to genome stability, they are events that commonly occur during both meiotic and mitotic cell division [9–11]. All cells have a capacity to repair DDSBs employing homologous recombination-based mechanisms that require the coordinated involvement of a number of protein families [9–11]. Among these protein families are the RAD proteins [9–11]. RAD51 displays DNA-stimulated ATPase activity, preferentially binds to single-stranded DNA, and mediates ATP-dependent strand exchange events with homologous duplex DNA [11]. A role for RAD51 in repairing DDSBs during early development was reported by Perez et al. [9], who microinjected RAD51 into fertilized oocytes and observed reduced DNA damage, reduced apoptosis, and improved embryo development in AKR/J mice, a mouse strain displaying a very poor DDSB repair mechanism. The same group of researchers also demonstrated that mouse embryos overexpressing RAD51 display reduced DNA damage and cytoplasmic fragmentation [10]. Deletion of RAD51 results in early embryonic lethality [12] and the RAD51C hypomorph displays meiotic failure in both males and females [13]. Therefore, Kujjo et al. [5] focused their studies on investigating the effects of radiation damage on oocyte health on an ideal candidate, i.e., RAD51. They have convincingly demonstrated Correspondence: Andrew J. Watson, OB/GYN and Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, Victoria Research Laboratories, Children’s Health Research Institute, 800 Commissioners Road, London, ON Canada N6A 4G5. E-mail: awatson@uwo.ca
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».