Latest Cretaceous forearc basin development along an accretionary convergent margin: South-central Alaska
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Other| January 01, 2008 Latest Cretaceous forearc basin development along an accretionary convergent margin: South-central Alaska Jeffrey M. Trop Jeffrey M. Trop 1Department of Geology, Bucknell University, Moore Avenue, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar GSA Bulletin (2008) 120 (1-2): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1130/B26215.1 Article history received: 06 Mar 2007 rev-recd: 03 Jul 2007 accepted: 07 Jul 2007 first online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jeffrey M. Trop; Latest Cretaceous forearc basin development along an accretionary convergent margin: South-central Alaska. GSA Bulletin 2008;; 120 (1-2): 207–224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B26215.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract Upper Cretaceous sedimentary strata exposed in south-central Alaska provide insight on tectonic processes that shaped the northern Pacific margin following accretion of the Wrangellia composite terrane, the largest addition of crust to North America over the past 100 m.y. Sedimentologic, geochronologic, biostratigraphic, and petrographic data from the Matanuska Formation permit reconstruction of the tectono-sedimentary history of strata in a forearc basin constructed upon accreted oceanic-arc crust. The Matanuska Formation consists of >3 km of sedimentary strata exposed in the northern Chugach Mountains, Matanuska Valley, and southern Talkeetna Mountains of interior south-central Alaska. Measured stratigraphic sections and lithofacies analyses demonstrate that mass slumps and slides, debris flows, and turbidity currents deposited Campanian–Maastrichtian sandstone, conglomerate, and mudstone on a gullied, trenchward-dipping submarine ramp. Benthic foraminifera, inoceramid bivalves, and Nereites ichnogenera indicate deposition mainly at bathyal water depths. Sandstone and conglomerate petrofacies are characterized by monocrystalline quartz, plagioclase feldspar, and volcanic lithic fragments (Q39F40L21, Qm29F40Lt32, Lm25Lv42Ls32, and Qm42P54K4). Jurassic–Cretaceous arc plutons exposed north of the basin were an important sediment source, based on U-Pb zircon ages of granitoid clasts from conglomerate and detrital zircons from sandstone. Coeval arc plutons were unroofed relatively quickly, judging by the presence of 77–71 Ma detrital zircons in sandstone and 79–77 Ma granitic clasts in conglomerate, together with Maastrichtian (71–65 Ma) ammonite and foraminifera fossils. Sparse Paleozoic–Triassic detrital zircons indicate minor sediment contribution from inboard sources, including the Yukon-Tanana composite terrane and recycled Jurassic–Cretaceous sedimentary strata (Kahiltna assemblage).New data from the upper Matanuska Formation, together with recent studies from age-equivalent strata exposed in the Alaska Range and Wrangell Mountains, provide an exceptional example of basin development along a subduction margin shortly following accretion of an oceanic arc. Forearc basin development was dominated by subsidence and sediment gravity flow deposits enriched in plutonic and volcanic clasts eroded from both remnant- and coeval-arc plutons. Within the arc, newly recognized conglomerate in the northern Talkeetna Mountains records erosion of coeval- and remnant-arc source terranes to the south and Precambrian–Paleozoic sources to the north. Farther inboard, syndepositional shortening prompted thrust-top basin development and accumulation of alluvial-lacustrine strata derived from both the former continental margin to the north and accreted oceanic rocks to the south. Regional subsidence and basin development terminated during late Maastrichtian–early Paleocene time, coincident with subduction of progressively younger oceanic lithosphere inboard of an oceanic spreading center. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,056 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».