Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: A Very Red Life: The Story of Bill Walsh Craig Heron A Very Red Life: The Story of Bill Walsh. Cy Gonick. St John's: Canadian Committee on Labour History, 2001. Pp. 300, illus. $24.95 Canadian working-class history has developed a rich and varied texture that extends far beyond the parties of the Left, but Communists still fascinate us. Maybe it was their dash and daring in leading major struggles of wage-earners, or maybe their uncompromising class analysis that so many labour historians still share in some form. Whatever the motivation, many scholars have helped to generate a steady stream of biographies and autobiographies of former Communists over the past twenty years. Many have been collaborative efforts between a historian and an elderly radical to produce a first-person account based on lengthy interviews, but when Winnipeg political economist Cy Gonick proposed such an arrangement to the aging Bill Walsh, he demurred. So Gonick undertook his own biographical treatment based on interviews with Walsh, his family, friends, and comrades, and a limited archival record. Although Walsh seemed to lack the charismatic spark of figures like J.B. McLachlan, Annie Buller, Joe Salsberg, Jack Scott, or C.S. Jackson, he certainly lacked none of the commitment and passion for the cause. His route into the Communist movement did not follow the familiar path of radicalization within a working-class neighbourhood. Born as Moishe Wolofky, he started out as an apolitical youth from a middle-class Jewish family in Montreal, who innocently hitchhiked his way into the Soviet Union in 1931, along with his inseparable sidekick Moe Kosawatsky [End Page 862] (later known as Dick Steele). There they took factory jobs in Minsk and were swept up into Communism. Two years later, under pressure from his father and with the blessing of the Communist International, Moishe reluctantly returned to Canada. Within months he began what would stretch into three decades of full-time work for the Communist Party and the unions in which it was a prominent leader, first in Toronto, then Kitchener, and finally Hamilton, where he was attached to the United Electrical Workers (UE) for two decades. That political engagement got him jailed with other Communists in 1940, but also put him at the centre of some major strikes in the rise and consolidation of CIO-industrial unionism, notably those of Kitchener rubber workers in 1937 and Hamilton electrical workers in 1946. In fact, union work was his real passion, and he stayed out of the upper echelons of the Communist Party to concentrate on organizing, and played no major role in the party's internal battles. Gonick's account of Walsh's life does not fundamentally alter the received wisdom on labour and the Left since the 1930s. He relies on the standard secondary literature to sketch in background and more or less fits the man into that narrative. The book nonetheless does give more texture and complexity to the inner life of the Communist movement. The unswerving loyalty and discipline expected of party members certainly framed Walsh's life, and he hung in doggedly through major crises inside the organization, particularly the wild swings of party policy in the early 1940s and the devastating splits of 1956. But it seems that there was some space for both personal initiative and dissent. The book gives lots of space to the stories of the ingenuity and creativity demanded of party officials like Walsh, who typically had limited resources at hand and only a handful of supporters to sustain their efforts. At the same time, Walsh was never a completely compliant comrade, and from time to time his argumentative style raised the hackles of party leaders. At the end of the Second World War, after returning from three years of military service, for example, he pestered the party leadership about the flip-flops in its political line on the war (and consequently got a public dressing down at the party school by its major theoretician, Stanley Ryerson). Many of those tensions revolved around the dual allegiance to party and union that perplexed those Communists who worked in the labour movement and that became a central theme...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».