MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W215542727 · doi:10.1353/nin.2013.0054

The Summer of Beer and Whiskey: How Brewers, Barkeeps, Rowdies, Immigrants, and a Wild Pennant Fight Made Baseball America’s Game by Edward Achorn (review)

2013· article· en· W215542727 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ron Kates

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLeagueImmigrationArt historyArtHistoryArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Summer of Beer and Whiskey: How Brewers, Barkeeps, Rowdies, Immigrants, and a Wild Pennant Fight Made Baseball America’s Game by Edward Achorn Ron Kates Edward Achorn. The Summer of Beer and Whiskey: How Brewers, Barkeeps, Rowdies, Immigrants, and a Wild Pennant Fight Made Baseball America’s Game. Philadelphia: Public Affairs, 2013. 291 pp. Paper, $26.99. As author Edward Achorn notes in his preface, “the American Association’s summer of 1883 … marvelously opens a window, as baseball always does, into the culture of America of its time—the harsh struggle, the cruel and mocking racism, the heavy drinking, and the triumphant, glorious spirit of individual achievement of the day” (xiii). Focusing primarily on two teams, the St. Louis Brown Stockings and Philadelphia Athletics, Achorn offers readers a panoramic perspective of the season while also taking time to profile select stars from both teams. Along the way, aided by illustrations drawn by Cincinnati Reds first baseman Long John Reilly, as well as anecdotes and game descriptions provided by contemporary reporters and players, the reader is transported back to “the year America went baseball mad” (xiii), a time when the competition between the established and highbrow National League and the freewheeling American Association resulted in far-reaching ramifications. While Achorn profiles Hall of Famers (Charlie Comiskey, Tim Keefe, and Cap Anson), should-be Hall of Famers (Pete Browning, Bobby Mathews, and Tony Mullane), and other period characters (including Arlie Latham, the “Freshest Man on Earth,” [63] and “The Only” Nolan), he spends significant portions of the book focusing on Brown Stockings owner—and St. Louis beer magnate—Chris Von der Ahe. Achorn praises Von der Ahe’s “vision of making a day at the ballpark a more exciting experience than ever before, [End Page 141] with cheap tickets, booming beer sales, and big crowds adorned by beautiful women” (12), as well as his scheduling Sunday games as a means to “welcome working men and fellow immigrants, those who toiled all week and could not break free from their jobs to attend a game” (13). Achorn describes how Von der Ahe displays both a Veeckian innovative spirit alongside a Steinbrenneresque combativeness—unafraid to challenge the status quo concerning Sunday baseball and ballpark beer sales. The Brown Stockings owner’s propensity to interfere with the on-field activities of his manager and players only intensified as the Association’s pennant race continued into September. In similar, albeit unequal fashion, Achorn also portrays Von der Ahe’s Philadelphia counterpart, renowned minstrel actor and former ballplayer Lew Simmons, whose dedication to his team borders on obsession. Much of the book’s on-field descriptions center on the four series the Brown Stockings and Athletics played throughout the American Association’s 1883 season. Incredibly, as Achorn notes, the penultimate series—and the last one hosted in Philadelphia—drew “a stunning 50,000 [spectators] for the series” (191), a remarkable figure given the size of the ballparks, the limited spectator base, and the relative newness of the game. Indeed, more than a few modern teams would be pleased with a similar draw over the course of a weekend series. In this series Achorn introduces readers to “Jumping Jack” Jones, the Yale pitcher whose motion involved him “leap[ing] into the air as he released the ball, flinging his arms and legs out in a manner that reminded reporters of a child’s jumping jack” (187). Jones, a character familiar to those fans who can recall Mark Fidrych, Al Hrabosky, and Turk Wendell, not only beat the Brown Stockings in a pivotal game during this series, he also clinched the pennant for the Athletics with an extra-inning win over the Baltimore Orioles. A hero to Philadephians grateful for his contribution to the Athletics pennant, Jones never pitched again in the major leagues, returning to Yale to finish medical school and then head to Harvard to study dentistry (246). But for these accounts of his Doyle Alexander-like September performance, Jumping Jack Jones would remain a footnote to nineteenth-century baseball history. And his story, like others Achorn has uncovered, points to the book’s value as a means of further preserving less-told stories...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,693
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,987

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,186
Écart entre enseignants0,180 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207