Sustainable Development, Evaluation and Policy-Making: Theory, Practise and Quality Assurance edited by Anneke von Raggamby and Frieder Rubik
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Appearing in the ‘Evaluating Sustainable Development’ book series, Sustainable Development, Evaluation and Policy-Making, Theory, Practise and Quality Assurance comprises 15 essays organised into five sections: 1), perceptions of sustainability and related issue s ; 2), evaluation and assessment in policy formulation; 3), policy implementation in different areas; 4), policy reformulation and monitoring; and finally 5), quality of evaluations. A general introduction written by the co-editors plus Anna Hirschbeck, preceds these essays, provides a few definitions, and explains how the contributions in each section hold together. Interestingly, about half of the contributors come from Germany and the Netherlands. Thus, many of the references and policies studied here are from these countries, which will be inspiring and perhaps thought-provoking for many American readers. This is one of the strengths of this collection of essays: we are granted these specific perspectives and varied European contexts. The contributions by German scholars in this book are particularly important and instructive, for at least two reasons. First, they are strongly grounded in theory; and secondly, they rely on sources and frameworks in the German language that are not always familiar to Anglophone readers. All contributors provide definitions, case studies, data, useful figures, comparisons, and theoretical thoughts, sometimes already familiar, and in other cases innovative (p. xiii). For instance, the first objective of social-ecological research quoted in the (too short) Introduction seems to be derived from the definition of sustainable development carried in the famous Brundtland Report from 1987, which promoted: … the ecological modernisation of society without neglecting mankind’s desire for social justice and prosperity. (p. xiv) … development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. (p. 44) … a common definition of sustainability does not currently exist. (p. 210) … for sustainability evaluations to equally address all dimensions of sustainable development. (p. xiii) … fostering cross-disciplinary pooling of knowledge to provide scientific contributions to solving concrete social problems of sustainability and requiring interdisciplinary cooperation between researchers in the natural and the social sciences. (p. xiv) … encouraging research to look beyond the science system and take into account the expert knowledge which exists in practice by including social actors such as consumers, municipalities, companies and civil society in the research process in different ways (transdisciplinary). (p. xiv)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,035 | 0,032 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle