Long-Term Outcome in Dogs After Surgical Repair of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) disease is one of the most common causes of lameness in dogs. Surgical treatment is recommended to stabilize the stifle joint, alleviate pain, and delay the progression of osteoarthritis (OA). A variety of surgical techniques has been introduced and can be broken down into the more traditional intracapsular ligament replacement and extracapsular suture techniques and the newer neutralizing dynamic osteotomy techniques. Although an enormous amount of literature is available concerning this disease, surprisingly few studies have assessed surgical outcome with objective evaluation methods and comparison between groups. Previous studies have demonstrated significant improvement of limb function after CCL surgery. However, OA has been shown to progress in most patients, and this may cause deterioration in the function of the surgically treated limb over time. Long-term follow-up studies that include objective evaluation methods designed for assessing orthopedic outcome are needed. This thesis aimed to evaluate the long-term surgical outcome and signs of chronic pain after CCL surgery. Also, outcomes between the intracapsular, extracapsular and osteotomy techniques were compared. A multimodal approach, including an owner questionnaire and assessment of chronic pain using the validated Helsinki Chronic Pain Index (HCPI), orthopedic and radiographic examinations, force plate analysis, and as a new evaluation method, a physiotherapeutic examination was included. To provide reference values, clinically healthy Rottweilers and Labrador Retrievers were examined. A long-term retrospective follow-up with a mean time interval of at least 2.7 years between the surgery and evaluation was conducted. Of the 206 surgically treated dogs that were evaluated by their owners, 31.1% had a HCPI value ≥ 12, indicating pain. Of the 47 dogs evaluated by a veterinarian 31.9% showed a pain response to flexion/extension of the surgically treated joint. In addition to the unilaterally treated CCL rupture, contralateral stifle joint pathology and other orthopedic problems were frequently diagnosed during the evaluation. When symmetry of weight bearing was evaluated in dogs with no other orthopedic findings (n=21),approximately 30% of dogs had decreased dynamic and static weight bearing in the surgically treated limbs. Also, goniometric angles of the surgically treated limbs remained inferior to those of healthy limbs, and impairment of active range of motion was frequently observed. The owner assessments revealed no significant differences between the surgical techniques in long-term outcome. However, differences were seen in clinical evaluation of dynamic and static weight bearing between intracapsular and osteotomy technique groups. Although the retrospective study design and low sample size have to be acknowledged and may cause bias to the results, osteotomy techniques may offer long-term limb function that is superior to that achieved with the intracapsular technique. The low number of dogs treated with the extracapsular technique did not allow comparison of dynamic or static weight bearing to other technique groups.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».