MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2156507226

DISENTANGLING THE LINK BETWEEN DISRUPTED FAMILIES AND DELINQUENCY

2001· article· en· W2156507226 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Établissements canadiensUniversité de Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJuvenile delinquencyPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyLongitudinal studyCriminologyDemographySociologyMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 South London males from age 8 to age 46. Delinquency rates were higher among 75 boys who were living in permanently disrupted families on their fifteenth birthday, compared to boys living in intact families. Results were very similar whether juvenile convictions, juvenile self-reported delinquency or adult convictions were studied. Delinquency rates were similar in disrupted families and in intact high conflict families. Boys who lost their mothers were more likely to be delinquent than boys who lost their fathers, and disruptions caused by parental disharmony were more damaging than disruptions caused by parental death. Boys from disrupted families who continued living with their mothers had similar delinquency rates to boys from intact harmonious families. These results are more concordant with life course theories rather than with trauma theories or selection theories of the effects of family disruption. Broken Homes and Delinquency Fuelled by the increasing instability of marital relationships since the 1960s, which has led to ever-increasing proportions of children experiencing disruption of their family life, the last three decades have witnessed a massive increase in research into the effect of parental separation and divorce on children. Within criminology, ‘the topic of broken homes has been a central part of delinquency theory since the emergence of criminology in the 19th century’ (Wells and Rankin 1991: 71). Rising juvenile crime rates coinciding with this increase in family instability provided an added impetus to carry out research into the link between disrupted families and delinquency. In this paper, we will discuss some of the complexities involved in analysing the association, and review explanations put forward to account for it. We will then test these explanations using data collected in the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, which is a prospective longitudinal study of 411 South London males from age 8 to age 46. Early research up to the 1960s (e.g. Douglas et al. 1968; Glueck and Glueck 1950) revealed a considerably higher incidence of family disruption among delinquents convicted of criminal offences than among the non-delinquent population. American research from the 1950s suggested that a large part of the relation might reflect differential treatment by the police and courts (Wilkinson 1974); arguably, because two-parent homes were thought to be better able to provide supervision, youths from such homes were less often brought to court than were those from disrupted families. Nye’s (1958) study of high school students in Washington State, for example, revealed that the relationship between broken homes and delinquency was much reduced using self-reports. An

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,433
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle