Multipath adaptive filtering in GNSS/RTK-based machine automation applications
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Machine control and automation has always been perceived as an intermediate process to increase industrial productivity (and thus profitability), operability, comfort, and safety net gain for human lives and goods. However one of the biggest limitation factors to achieve and implement successful automation systems for the markets of surveying, precision agriculture, aircraft precision approach, maritime ship guidance, and construction automation (just to name a few) has been the difficulty to prove that the underlying positioning infra-structure can provide reliably and continuously position and navigation information throughout all conditions, and scenarios. Nevertheless, in these days the automation of machines based on GNSS-RTK techniques is becoming one of the major trends in the precise positioning industry. In fact, it is projected to grow even further in the long term with the advent of new SBAS and GNSS systems such as the European EGNOS and Galileo systems, respectively. Undoubtedly the decrease in price and complexity from the integration of GNSS with other sensor systems (such as inertial providing higher bandwidths, and lasers bringing better one-dimensional accuracies), has made machinery automation solutions more robust and applicable in different scenarios, including in high-dynamic/vibration applications and harsh environments. Moreover, with the growing establishment of continuous operating GNSS reference stations, to be employed in network-RTK services from which machine automation has been one of the most keen users, some of the problems in mitigating GNSS residual biases (mostly atmospheric) known to occur in the single-baseline RTK technique, have been successfully ameliorated. Despite all these improvements, the mitigation of carrierphase multipath in real-time remains, to a large extent, very limited (contrarily to the mitigation of code multipath through receiver improvements) and it is commonly considered the major source of error in GNSS-RTK applications. This is due to the very nature of multipath spectra, which depends mainly on the antenna location and characteristics of the reflector(s) in its vicinity. Any change in this binomial (antenna/reflectors) regardless of how small, will cause an unknown multipath effect, thus the removal of this error due to receiver spatial correlation is not achievable. In machine automation applications the machinery is expected to perform complex and unpredictable manoeuvres, therefore the removal of carrier-phase multipath should rely on smart digital filtering techniques that adapt not only to the background multipath (coming mostly from the machine reflecting surfaces), but also to the changing multipath environment along the machine path. In this paper, we describe how a typical GPS-based machine automation application using a dual antenna system is used to calibrate, in a first stage, and remove carrier-phase multipath afterwards. The intricate relationship between the platform's 2 rover antennas' dynamics and the changing multipath from nearby reflectors is explored and modelled through several stochastic and dynamical models, and their implementation in an extended Kalman filter (EKF). Tests were performed using real live satellite signals, and from the results we can say that it is possible to estimate in real time, after an initial calibration phase, the relative position of short distance strong multipath reflectors in the vicinity of the platform. Based on that, a multipath profile is created and used to correct the multipath-affected signals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».