MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2158181863 · doi:10.1242/jeb.00904

Obituary Memories of Bob Boutilier

2004· article· en· W2158181863 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Dan Toews

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Établissements canadiensAcadia University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSisterObituaryBrotherArt historyPsychologyHistorySociologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Robert Graeme Boutilier, Bob or “Boots” to many, and Bobby to his family was born on 8 September 1953, a few months over 50 years ago in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Growing up, his older sister Brenda always called him “my big little brother”. He went to high school in Halifax and completed his first year of university there at Dalhousie, an institution where he would later become professor and Department Head. As a first year student, he also started a rock band, being a talented musician. After the first year, his parents moved 100 km across the province to Wolfville, where his father retired and Bob enrolled at Acadia University. I first met Bob in 1971, when I was giving back midterm examinations in my first class at Acadia. After trying to correctly pronounce the student's French names, including `Robert Boutilier', with my Alberta accent, there was one lad near the front who, at the end of class, raised his hand and said politely“Sir, you don't have an exam for a Bobby `Bootleer' do you?”.Although he initially wanted to be a dentist, he developed a fascination for toads and things amphibian and, during his penultimate undergraduate year,did a fine study looking at the respiratory physiology of toads during progressive hypoxia. I thought the work was publishable and Bob asked what the best journal was for submission. My answer was of course The Journal of Experimental Biology but suggested he send it elsewhere as he would not want his first paper rejected. Bob, being incredibly determined, wrote it up and submitted it to the JEB and, of course, it was accepted. From day one, he loved that Journal and, as we know, several years ago he became its editor and it became a major part of his life. The 12 primary publications that arose from his Bachelor's and Master's degrees at Acadia illustrate another talent that always stood him in good stead. As a “first draft–final draft” writer, his sentences in publications and his spoken words in class and at conferences were always crystal clear, lacking excessive verbosity.A side of Bob that many did not know is that he loved to play golf, and his finesse around the greens was at “pro” level. On his 35th birthday, he shot his age on the first nine at a difficult Nova Scotia course. He went on to complete the game at 1 over par, 71. As a Master's student at Acadia, his quick reflexes and adept hand–eye coordination moved him to number 2 on the Biology squash ladder. He never beat his supervisor, but perhaps there was some of the Boutilier political astuteness involved in that.Bob and I used to love telling stories about each other, and when in public, or with students, we had an agreement that we would not correct each other, and indeed, some of the tales, especially Bob's, became warmly embellished. It is true, however, that in his early scientific career Bob followed what we affectionately call the reverse Krogh principle to facilitate his travels around the world. His most favourite axiom was “never choose an experimental animal that is only found in Cleveland, Ohio”. His science was uniquely inventive. While working on land crabs in Tahiti, he and Chris Wood wanted to exercise the crabs but lacked a treadmill. Not to be deterred, Bob bought a variable-speed belt sander at a local store, turned it upside down and it became part of a unique series of experiments on crab exercise. His science became more cellular and biochemical in later years but he was always interested in the whole animal and how each small piece fit into the big picture.Bob, though kind, usually quiet and gentle, was fiercely independent, and this at times complicated his life. We laughed many times about how as a Master's student in 1976 I took him to some international meetings in Paris. As his supervisor, I offered to order his breakfast from a cranky French waiter. “Of course not”, was his retort, “I can speak French”, which he then tried to do. The waiter snuffled appropriately and asked Bob “Would you like to try English, Monsieur; you have just ordered a fried pencil”.Bob loved his parents and family dearly, coming back to Nova Scotia at least twice a year to visit. Although his mother, Anne, at 93 probably does not fully understand what happened in December, she loved her Bobby dearly and was extremely proud that he was, to use her words, a “Cambridge professor”.A myriad of Bob Boutilier stories abound around the world. I know of very few people who are fortunate enough to receive that unique combination of love and respect. He was simply fun to be around. His presence and warm smile made a room come to life. He loved his students and defended them fiercely should anyone say an unkind word about them. To him, science, the journal and teaching were simply “fun”. He relished having good times as well. His family in England was his dear Sidney Sussex College, where he delighted in the Fellowship, as well as Margaret Clements and many others in the JEB office.He spent New Years Eve with my family in rural Nova Scotia every year and waited for midnight when tradition granted that he could shoot the 12-gauge shotgun off the deck. He confessed to his friends in Cambridge that one year he just missed a cow in the field next door, but in fact it was only the neighbour's house, whose occupants eventually got used to our midnight antics. His last words to me, which he wrote on a clipboard on 13 December, when I saw him last, were “Shoot one off the deck for me, Dan; I probably won't make it this year”. Sadly, he did not make it. We will all miss him immensely, but the science and stories will live on, as he does, in our hearts and memories.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,063
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,211

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,002
Communication savante0,0050,004
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0630,035

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Experimental BiologyMême sujetHigh Altitude and HypoxiaTravaux en français237 207