MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2159218173 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkm062

Carbapenem resistance in Bacteroides fragilis

2007· letter· en· W2159218173 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Lei Ang, N. Brenwald, Rebecca Walker, J. M. Andrews, A.P. Fraise

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2007
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Mots-clésBacteroides fragilisMicrobiologyCarbapenemBiologyBacteroidesAntibacterial agentMedicineAntibioticsBacteria

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibiotics used in the treatment of infections predominantly caused by Gram-negative bacteria, including Bacteroides fragilis. Such infections are mainly those with intra-abdominal aetiology and polymicrobial wound infections. Carbapenem-resistant B. fragilis isolates were first reported in Japan over two decades ago and subsequently in the USA. Carbapenem resistance in B. fragilis is most commonly due to the presence of Ambler class B metallo-β-lactamase CfiA.1cfiA is normally poorly expressed; however, increased expression of cfiA, caused by the acquisition of an insertion sequence (IS) upstream of the gene, can lead to high-level carbapenem resistance.2 The in vivo selection of high-level carbapenem-resistant mutants from carbapenem-susceptible cfiA-encoding B. fragilis has been shown to occur during carbapenem therapy.2 Thus, it is important to be able to detect cfiA-encoding isolates so that treatment with carbapenems can be avoided. Although PCR can be used for detecting isolates encoding cfiA, its use may not be applicable in a routine diagnostic laboratory. We investigated whether a simple disc susceptibility method could be used to facilitate the detection of cfiA-encoding B. fragilis. We determined the meropenem susceptibility of 77 B. fragilis clinical isolates collected from City Hospital, Birmingham, UK (1995–2005). The MIC of meropenem was determined by an agar dilution method3 using Iso-Sensitest agar (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood and 20 mg/L β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) with an inoculum of 104 cfu/spot. Using the same medium, the disc susceptibility of isolates to meropenem was determined using the BSAC standardized disc susceptibility method and a meropenem 10 µg disc.4 All plates were incubated at 35–37°C in an anaerobic atmosphere (GENbox, bioMérieux, Basingstoke, UK) for 24 h. The detection of cepA and cfiA (including adjacent upstream region) was carried out by PCR using primers and conditions described previously.5,6 Additionally, the MICs of ertapenem, imipenem, co-amoxiclav and metronidazole for cfiA-positive isolates were determined using the BSAC standardized agar dilution method, employing supplemented Iso-Sensitest agar as above. B. fragilis NCTC 9343 was used as a control for all susceptibility testing and as a cfiA-negative control. A cfiA-positive control strain, B. fragilis strain 15, was obtained from the Anaerobic Reference Laboratory, NPHS Microbiology, Cardiff, Wales. Of the 77 clinical isolates tested, 7 were cfiA-positive; all 7 had PCR amplimers of ∼400 bp, which is evidence that they do not have an IS immediately upstream of cfiA. In contrast, the cfiA-positive control (B. fragilis strain 15) produced an amplimer of ∼2000 bp, which is consistent with the presence of an IS just upstream of cfiA. The seven cfiA-positive clinical isolates formed a discrete population showing reduced susceptibility to meropenem (Table 1). All had higher meropenem MICs (range 1–4 mg/L) compared with the MICs of meropenem for the 70 cfiA-negative isolates (MIC range 0.06–0.25 mg/L). By disc susceptibility method, the 7 cfiA-positive isolates all had zones of inhibition for meropenem of <30 mm (22–27 mm), whereas the 70 cfiA-negative isolates had zones of inhibition of >30 mm (range 32–45 mm). The positive control strain with upstream IS had no zone of inhibition to meropenem and a meropenem MIC of >128 mg/L. Susceptibility and PCR results for cfiA-positive B. fragilis isolates MEM, meropenem; IPM, imipenem; EPM, ertapenem; AMC, co-amoxiclav; MET, metronidazole; NZ, no zone; NA, not applicable. aMeropenem 10 µg disc. Susceptibility and PCR results for cfiA-positive B. fragilis isolates MEM, meropenem; IPM, imipenem; EPM, ertapenem; AMC, co-amoxiclav; MET, metronidazole; NZ, no zone; NA, not applicable. aMeropenem 10 µg disc. Our results would suggest that a standardized disc susceptibility method could be used for detecting B. fragilis isolates harbouring cfiA (both high-level and low-level carbapenem resistance). The detection of potential cfiA-encoding isolates would help avoid inappropriate carbapenem usage, which might lead to treatment failure or the selection of high-level carbapenem-resistant mutants. The finding of concomitant metronidazole resistance in two of the cfiA-positive isolates is worrying, as it further reduces the therapeutic options for treating infection caused by these organisms. We would like to thank the Anaerobic Reference Laboratory, HPA Cardiff, Wales, for supplying the high-level carbapenem-resistant control strains. None to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyMême sujetBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingTravaux en français237 207