Persistence with Cholinesterase Inhibitor Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Three cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) are approved in Canada for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD): donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine.This class of drugs provides modest improvement of some symptoms of the disease but it does not alter its course 1 .The fourth Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD) concluded that the three ChEI demonstrated comparable efficacy for mild to severe AD, and that a trial of one of these medications should be proposed for most patients with AD 2 .As ChEI are relatively costly and their clinical benefits are mild, persistence with treatment has been an issue since their arrival on the Canadian market.In most provinces, these medications are reimbursed according to very specific criteria.For example, in Quebec, reimbursement of these medications is conditional on a clear diagnosis, a general rating of disease severity in five clinical domains, and specific cut-offs on the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE).Upon renewing ChEI prescription, reimbursement is granted if the patient improves, stabilises, or does not deteriorate significantly in several clinical domains and on the MMSE.These criteria, which are based on the results of clinical trials with ChEI, are far from perfect, but they do serve as a general guide to their use in clinical practice.In clinical trials, patients are followed very closely and their symptoms are monitored on a regular basis.This will tend to reinforce persistence to treatment, but may be difficult to reproduce in real-life clinical practice.In that respect, the setting of clinical trials is "artificial".Nevertheless, the rate of withdrawal from ChEI after six months of treatment has varied between 20% and 30% in clinical trials, depending on the molecule used and the method of administration (immediate release vs extended release, oral vs transdermal, etc.) [3][4][5] .There are few clinical trials beyond six month duration, and they have usually demonstrated similar withdrawal rates.In this issue of the Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Saleh et al investigated persistence to ChEI in a small group of patients in a memory clinic in rural Saskatchewan 6 .Several factors were examined including socio-demographic, cognitive, functional and behavioural measures.The level of education was the only factor associated with discontinuation of ChEI.Out of the 63 patients initially started on ChEI, 19 discontinued treatment, and those with fewer years of formal education had higher rates of drug discontinuation at six months.Authors explain this finding by speculating that patients with more years of formal education were better able to understand the importance of treatment persistence and dealing with its side effects.The main limitation of this study is its modest sample size, meaning that type II error cannot be excluded.Also, it is unclear why such a small proportion of all patients evaluated (318) was included in the study.We assume that some individuals referred to this clinic were already on ChEI, and they were excluded, but this cannot be the case for most patients.Nevertheless, this study population represents a "real life"
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».