Increased Oil Recovery by Permeability Modification in High Permeability Contrast Slim Tubes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Biofilm and biopolymers produced from microbes have been shown to reduce the permeability of high perm streaks which can result in improved sweep efficiency. The rate of permeability modification is very reproducible but can vary depending on the specific treatments used. Our approach has been to inoculate the reservoir with a microbe that under the optimal nutrient conditions will express a biopolymer as a film, reduce the size of pore throats and reduce the apparent permeability. The microbe and the nutrients are tailored to the conditions of each reservoir thus giving MEOR the greatest chance for success. In this paper we describe the use of a high permeability contrast composite slim tube to demonstrate increased oil recovery using microbes that generate biofilms to reduce the permeability contrast and thus improve sweep efficiency. In this setup, three hydraulically constrained slim tubes – working as very long sand packs – were constructed from different sources of sand with a range of particle size distributions. Absolute and differential pressure transducers were used to monitor the pressure drop across individual slim tubes and across the composite configuration of the three slim tubes. Oil traps were located at the exit of each slim tube to measure the oil production from each tube. The permeabilities of the slim tubes against a high salt injection brine (TDS ∼ 85,000 ppm) were measured to be 45, 4.5 and 2.6 Darcy. This presented a challenging system with a slim tube at a very high permeability that would need to be reduced by the MEOR treatment. Oil (viscosity of ∼58 cp) was pumped independently into each slim tube to assure that each slim tube was at residual water saturation. The slim tubes were allowed to age before the start of the test. Once working in composite mode the flows of the injected brine and MEOR treatments were dictated only by the hydraulics of the composite slim tube. The produced fluids from all three slim tubes were sent to a single back pressure regulator. In the composite mode, oil was readily produced only from the high permeability slim tube during the initial (non-MEOR) flooding sequence. A salt tolerant microbe present in the target oil reservoir capable of producing biofilms and altering the permeability was inoculated into the composite slim tube. The inoculated microbes were batch fed periodically using a protocol that was scaled down from one that would be used in a field test. An increase in the pressure drop and corresponding increase in oil production from the lower permeable slim tubes was observed as a result of the treatment. This resulted in a dramatic increase in the recovery factor from the composite slim tube. This work is a continuation of tests described in earlier papers (SPE129657, SPE146483 and SPE159128 – references 4, 5 and 6).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».