Adolescent Literacy in the Academic Disciplines: General Principles and Practical Strategies
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Adolescent Literacy in the Academic Disciplines: General Principles and Practical Strategies edited by Tamara L. Jetton and Cynthia Shanahan New York, NY: Guildford Press, 2012, 274 pages ISBN: ISBN: 978-1-4625-0283-7 (hardcover), 978-1-4625-0280-6 (paperback) In Adolescent Literacy in the Academic Disciplines, editors Tamara L. Jetton and Cynthia Shanahan provide an overview of principles and strategies for guiding student reading in high school subject areas. The introduction and framing of the book is well researched, convincingly written, and densely packed with practical information. Chapter 1, Learning from Text: Adolescent Literacy from the Past Decade by Tamara L. Jetton and Richard Lee, describes the performance of American high school students on literacy tests and suggests that teachers need to spend more than the current 3% of classroom time on explicit reading strategies (Ness, 2007, 2009, as cited in Jetton & Shanahan, 2012, pp. 1-2). Chapters 2, 3, and 4 describe common reading challenges in the disciplines, habits of text used by disciplinary experts, and how to apply these ideas to lesson planning. Chapters 5 through 9, written by a variety of American-based scholars, are dedicated to describing the literacy strategies needed for specific high school subject areas. Chapter 1 includes a review of studies on strategies and instructional frameworks, outlining the context of each study and the key findings. For instance, concept-oriented reading instruction (CORI) is described as a framework that involves students in activating prior knowledge, generating questions, searching for information, organizing new knowledge and monitoring their comprehension (Guthrie, 2004, as cited in Jetton & Shanahan, 2012, p.10). Jetton and Lee explain that essential components that make the framework successful are student involvement in their own goal setting, reading relevant material, and engaging in discussion. They cite two studies that support CORI as effective for increasing student reading comprehension. In addition, Appendix 1.1 elaborates on further strategies and each of their associated objectives and instructions (pp. 24-33). Providing such a thorough overview of these strategies works to raise awareness of the broad range of options available and encourages readers to think about potential applications, depending on objectives and context. Jetton and Lee explain that more research is needed on which strategies work best for specific disciplines, thereby setting up the thesis for the book. The chapters that focus on language arts, math, science, history, and the arts are helpful in their level of detail and the use of classroom examples to illustrate different teaching and learning strategies in action. At their best, these chapters are well organized, relate to the thesis, clearly define assumptions and theories, and offer relevant teaching strategies. For instance, in the chapter Learning with Texts in History: Protocols for Reading and Practical Strategies, Bruce VanSledright anchors his argument in a description of the unique challenges and opportunities afforded by historical texts. He explains that they are hypertextual (draw from other texts), intertextual (require reading between different versions of the same events), and partially multimodal (span a variety of forms and media from pottery to film). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle