Population Structure and Genetic Variability in Northeastern Pacific Killer Whales: Towards an Assessment of Population Viability
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Long term studies of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the coastal waters of British Columbia have identified two sympatric non-associating populations: fish-eating residents and mammal-eating transients. A third group, the offshores, frequents the outer continental shelf. The resident population contains two regional subpopulations in British Columbia and is currently listed as threatened by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). In Alaska one additional putative subpopulation of residents and two of transients have been reported. This complex of populations and subpopulations persisting in the absence of obvious dispersal barriers presents a problem to conservation managers who must decide whether subpopulations should be assessed separately or in combination. Clearly, the decisions should rest on an understanding of the discreteness of the subpopulations. Here, we report a molecular study designed to contribute to such an understanding. This study a) characterized each known subpopulation of killer whales genetically, b) compared genetic variability between the subpopulations and c) analysed mating patterns within the resident subpopulations to determine inbreeding levels. Lightweight pneumatic darts were used to take biopsy samples from 269 individuallyidentified killer whales off British Columbia and Alaska. Nuclear DNA from the samples was typed at 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci, and the entire mitochondrial D-loop was sequenced. The results were used to construct population phylogenies, assess genetic diversity, calculate fixation indices (F-statistics), and conduct paternity analyses. The following findings were key: 1) resident and transient killer whales are reproductively isolated, 2) the division of each into three regional subpopulations is supported genetically, 3) offshores are genetically differentiated from all known resident and transient subpopulations, 4) residents have lower levels of genetic variation than transients, 5) the observation from field studies that residents remain in their natal groups for life is typical of the recent history of the population, 6) despite their lack of permanent dispersal, residents mate outside their natal groups. One transient subpopulation (the critically endangered AT1 population of the northern Gulf of Alaska) appears to be genetically isolated from all other subpopulations. Permanent dispersal between the remaining two transient subpopulations is very rare or non-existent, but gene flow mediated by occasional intermatings could not be ruled out. In the resident population, occasional intermatings may occur between the northern resident subpopulation (which inhabits central and northern British Columbian waters) and the Alaska resident subpopulation (found off the panhandle region of southern Alaska and the Gulf of Alaska coast). Our findings are consistent with the complete genetic isolation of the southern resident subpopulation of southern British Columbia and northern Washington. The southern resident subpopulation is of conservation concern because of its small size (less than 85 individuals), a recent decline, and high contaminant loads. Paternity analysis showed that resident killer whales have strong (presumably behavioural) inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. In all but one instance, pod members
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».