The lived experience of families of children who are failing to thrive
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to explore the experience of families of children who were failing to thrive. The aim of the study was not to generalize the findings but to generate a rich description of the phenomenon of living with children who were not growing as expected. BACKGROUND: Although failure to thrive has been found to have long-term negative implications for children there is little information available on how families experience this phenomenon. METHODS: A purposive sample of 12 families with children who were failing to thrive from multiple known and unknown reasons were interviewed (21 participants: mothers, fathers, and grandmothers). FINDINGS: Twenty-seven subthemes emerged from the descriptions provided by the participants and these were then grouped into seven themes. Families spoke of an all-encompassing fear with which they lived. They were affected by the comparisons of the children made by others and themselves. In the process of seeking care for the children, the families described how their concerns often were not heard by the professionals. They felt blamed for their children's growth failure and this added to a sense of isolation and helplessness. Nurses and doctors who listened and acknowledged that they trusted the family were respected and valued. Families felt they were then valuable members of the care team. Regardless of the difficulties, families described how they adapted and persevered in their attempt to provide as normal a life as possible for the children. They considered themselves the experts who best knew the children and continued to provide the complex care that was needed. CONCLUSIONS: The research suggests that health care professionals need to be more aware of the impact of their words and actions on families.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle