MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2160729556

Mandatory Bankruptcy Counseling: The Canadian Experience

2001· article· en· W2160729556 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueKent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal Systems and Judicial Processes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBankruptcyLegislatureDebtCreditorAgency (philosophy)BusinessAccountingActuarial scienceFinancePolitical scienceLawSociology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I. INTRODUCTION Like the United States, Canada has a relatively high rate of individual bankruptcy filings compared with other industrialized countries.1 While there are significant differences between the bankruptcy systems of the two countries, the Canadian system has two characteristics of interest to the current United States proposals on consumer bankruptcy reform. These are the use of means testing2 and the requirement of mandatory counseling as a condition of receiving a discharge.3 In this Article, I focus on mandatory counseling and discuss four issues concerning counseling: the nature and scope of bankruptcy counseling; its implementation in practice; existing evidence on its effectiveness; and finally, contrasting assumptions about counseling as a response to problems of debt. I conclude that the role and value of mandatory counseling remains controversial and the difficulties of providing objective measures of its success or failure ensure that a clear resolution of its success or failure is unlikely. II. THE INTRODUcTION OF MANDATORY COUNSELING Canada introduced mandatory counseling for bankrupts in 1992.(4) The rationale for the introduction of counseling was to prevent repeat bankruptcies5 and to further rehabilitative goals of behavior modification.6 Creditors had lobbied for the inclusion of mandatory counseling during legislative debates.7 The concept of counseling was also supported by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, the independent agency that regulates the bankruptcy process in Canada.8 Debtors in Canada may choose to declare straight bankruptcy, resulting in a discharge of most unsecured debts after nine months, or make a consumer proposal to repay all or a portion of their debts over a period not exceeding five years! The majority of debtors who declare bankruptcy make income repayments to the estate during the nine-month period before discharge, primarily to pay the fees11 of the trustee in bankruptcy. In addition, individuals with surplus income, as defined in the statutory guidelines,12 are required to contribute a percentage of their income during the nine-month period.13 Approximately fifteen percent of bankrupts fall within this category.14 The norm for a consumer proposal is a three-year repayment plan and the average proposal offers to pay approximately fifty percent of unsecured debts.15 Whichever route is chosen, whether bankruptcy or proposal, individuals are required to undergo two counseling sessions. A failure to attend a counseling session results in a debtor not receiving an automatic discharge and requires a court application for discharge.16 There are three instances in the Canadian bankruptcy process that could be characterized as counseling, although only two are formally described as such. At the point when an individual is considering bankruptcy and has visited a trustee, the trustee is required to make a pre-bankruptcy assessment of a potential bankrupt.17 This includes an outline of the debtor's financial affairs, a discussion of the debtor's options, including the option of a consumer proposal, and the various rights and responsibilities of the debtor.18 This directive was introduced in response to concerns that individuals were being processed through bankruptcy by clerical personnel in trustee firms without being provided with a full explanation of their options and without an opportunity to meet a trustee.19 The first formal counseling session takes place shortly after the declaration of bankruptcy20 and is titled Consumer and Credit Education.21 The counselor should provide the debtor at this stage with consumer advice in (i) money management; (ii) spending and shopping habits; (iii) warning signs of financial difficulties; and (iv) obtaining and using credit.22 The second counseling session, which takes place shortly before the discharge23 in a straight bankruptcy is entitled Identification of Road Blocks to Solvency and Rehabilitation. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,862
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle