Teaching university students to cook, to improve their diet: a pilot study at Nottingham Trent University
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Objective: To determine if it is feasible to teach students to cook cheap nutritious food that they would want to reproduce in their own student residences. Design and methodology: A cohort of interested students was trained using the established ‘Let's Get Cooking’ model (www.letsgetcooking.org.uk 2012) which has been used in schools across England to establish cooking clubs within communities. These students developed a programme of four weeks of two-hour cookery lessons aimed at the student lifestyle. A pilot was run in the summer term of 2011 with lessons given to willing participants for free. The participants, both those who carried out the teaching and those who were taught were all asked to evaluate the pilot. In the following autumn a further course was run using some of the same ‘teachers’ but this time the students paid £12 (GBP) for the course of lessons. Results: The feedback from those taught to cook in the sessions was very favourable with 91% of respondents rating the sessions as excellent or good on six aspects of the course. All the participants felt their skills had improved and they felt more confident about cooking. On the second part of the pilot where the students had paid, 89% rated the sessions as excellent or good on the same criteria and 100% had enjoyed the sessions; 84% thought their skills had improved and 75% felt more confident about cooking after the course. Fifty per cent indicated that they would continue to cook healthy food after the sessions had ended. Conclusions and implications: Evidence suggests that many students have not learned to cook and do not eat healthily; however, they are prepared to pay and attend cookery classes aimed at their needs. What is not known is, if by empowering students to cook cheap healthy food, whether or not they will continue to do this after the classes have ended? Keywords: ‘Let's Get Cooking’ clubsnutritioushealthycooking skillseconomical
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».