MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2161417134 · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2014-1566

The efficacy of telephone use to assist and improve the wellbeing of family caregivers of persons with chronic diseases: a systematic review

2014· review· en· W2161417134 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leidy Johanna Rueda Díaz, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · 2014
Typereview
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychological interventionMedicineRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)AnxietyInclusion (mineral)Family caregiversFamily medicineGerontologyNursingPsychologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background The experience of being a caregiver for a person with a chronic disease may cause self-negligence, increased duties and responsibilities, health issues, anxiety, depression and lifestyle-related changes for the caregiver. This means that caring may become a stress factor that impacts negatively on the caregiver and may overload them. Given the impact chronic diseases have on the quality of life of people and their families, it is important to establish interventions that are more efficient and less expensive than standard or routine care to promote the wellbeing of family caregivers. Despite studies that demonstrate the usefulness of the telephone in the delivery of health interventions, there is to date no summary of evidence on the effectiveness of its use. Therefore, addressing this gap in the literature is important for health professionals, in order to allow them to make evidence-based decisions regarding the use of the telephone in the delivery of interventions to improve the wellbeing of family caregivers of people with chronic diseases. Objective The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the best available evidence on the efficacy of interventions delivered using the telephone to improve the wellbeing of family caregivers of people with chronic diseases. Inclusion criteria Type of studies This review included randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Only randomized controlled trials were considered because the results of such studies generate the strongest conclusions on the efficacy of interventions. Types of participants This review considered studies that included family caregivers of people with chronic diseases in their sample, regardless of the disease type, severity and duration of care. Types of intervention Any studies that evaluated psycho-educational, psychosocial and psychotherapeutic interventions delivered using the telephone to reinforce the personal strengths, resources and coping skills of caregivers in order to improve their wellbeing in the physical, psychological and spiritual domains were evaluated for inclusion eligibility. Search strategy The search strategy used for the review focused on finding relevant studies, published and unpublished in the Portuguese, English and Spanish languages, published since 1995. The search was done between April 2013 and October 2013 in the databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE/Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PSYCRITIQUES (PsycINFO and Psycharticles), ProQuest, IBECS and LILACS, ISI Web Knowledge, Science Direct and Scopus. For unpublished studies the search included: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cybertesis, Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçoes, ADT, Diva, RCAAP- Repositório Cientfico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal, Theses Canada, Ethos, DART-Europe E-Theses Portal and National ETD Portal. Methodological quality Two reviewers independently appraised each article that met the inclusion criteria for methodological quality. For this purpose, the standardized critical appraisal tool from JBI-MAStARI was used. Data collection Quantitative data were extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI. Data synthesis The data extracted from the included studies was synthesized into a narrative summary. The heterogeneity of interventions, outcome measures and timing of reassessment prevented the conduct of a meta-analysis. Results Three studies comparing an intervention delivered by telephone with usual care, or with the same intervention delivered face to face at home, met the criteria for the review. The participants in the included studies were all dementia caregivers. In two of the three included studies, after completion of the telephone intervention, caregivers showed significantly lower perceived burden. Conclusion The strength of the evidence provided by the three studies was weak and highlights the need for further large randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of interventions using the telephone to improve the quality of life of family caregivers of people with chronic disease.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,938

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0060,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,333 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation ReportsMême sujetFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessTravaux en français237 207