MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2161940799

Management of hemorrhagic complications associated with antithrombotic therapy

2014· dissertation· en· W2161940799 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ammar Majeed

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2014
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAntithromboticMedicineDiscovery and development of direct thrombin inhibitorsThrombosisAnticoagulantCoagulationFibrinolytic agentPharmacologyHeparinPopulationIntensive care medicinePlateletThrombinSurgeryInternal medicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anticoagulants are used for the prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Such therapy is always associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Intracranial hemorrhage is the most serious form of anticoagulantsrelated bleeding and caries a high mortality rate. Many treating physicians and patients are reluctant to restart anticoagulation after such an event. For patients with continued increased risk of cardioembolism, the decision of when to restart anticoagulation is challenging and few small, single-center studies and case reports are the only available source of information. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) have been shown to rapidly correct the prolonged prothrombin time associated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy. The clinical efficacy of such treatment for controlling bleeding or preventing post-operative hemorrhage in patients treated with VKA is uncertain. Thromboembolism is a potential side effect of PCC and there are limited data on the risk of such complications. New direct oral anticoagulants are approved as alternatives for VKA. These agents lack antidote and the management and outcome of patients with major bleeding on these agents is uncertain. In this thesis different aspects of the management of anticoagulants-associated bleeding complications are studied and discussed. A cohort of 234 patients from Sweden and Canada with VKA-related intracranial hemorrhage was analyzed to establish the optimal time point for resumption of anticoagulation. Early resumption carries a high risk of recurrent bleeding, whereas the risk of thromboembolism increases with delayed start. According to the result of our study, the optimal timing of resuming iii anticoagulation after VKA-associated intracranial hemorrhage seems to be between week 10 and 30 after the event. A subgroup of the above-mentioned cohort was combined with another cohort from the Netherlands. A total of 135 patients were investigated to assess the effect of PCC - compared to plasma - on survival after VKA-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Unadjusted analysis showed a benefit for PCC treatment in reducing the 30-day all-cause mortality. After adjustment for differences in prognostic factors between the two treatment groups, especially the volume of intracerebral hematoma, the beneficial effect of PCC was attenuated and became non-significant. The safety of reversal of VKA with PCC was assessed in a third cohort of 160 Swedish patients with a major bleeding event or before emergency surgery. Six patients (3.8%) developed thromboembolic events (5 arterial and 1 venous) within a week after the administration of PCC. In these patients, the unmasking of the increased risk for thromboembolism by the reversal of anticoagulation and the activation of the coagulation system by the bleeding or surgery, seem to be important contributing factors, while PCC seem to increase the risk only minimally, if any. A cohort of 1121 patients with major bleeding on dabigatran or warfarin, derived from 5 phase III trials, was used to study the management and outcomes of these bleeding events in the absence of an antidote to dabigatran. The patients who suffered major bleeding on dabigatran were older, had more renal impairment and were more frequently treated with antiplatelet agents or non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs compared to those on warfarin, yet the outcome of dabigatran bleeding was better as reflected by a shorter stay by 1 day in the iv intensive care unit and lower 30-day all-cause mortality compared to the warfarin group. In summary, PCC seem to be safe for the treatment of VKA-associated bleeding, but their beneficial effect over plasma in case of intracerebral hemorrhage is questionable. The absence of a reversal agent for dabigatran does not seem to impact negatively on the outcome after major bleeding. When intracranial hemorrhage occurs on VKA resumption of anticoagulation should be delayed for 10-30 weeks. List of scientific papers I. Majeed A, Kim YK, Roberts RS, Holmstrom M, Schulman S. Optimal timing of resumption of warfarin after intracranial hemorrhage. Stroke. 2010;41(12):2860-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593087 II. Majeed A, Meijer K, Larrazabal R, Arnberg F, Luijckx GJ, Roberts RS, Holmström M, Schulman S. Mortality in vitamin K antagonist-related intracerebral bleeding treated with plasma or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2014;111(2):233-9. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH13-07-0536 III. Majeed A, Eelde A, Agren A, Schulman S, Holmstrom M. Thromboembolic safety and efficacy of prothrombin complex concentrates in the emergency reversal of warfarin coagulopathy. Thrombosis Research. 2012;129(2):146-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2011.07.024 IV. Majeed A, Hwang HG, Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, Ezekowitz MD, Wallentin L, Brueckmann M, Fraessdorf M, Yusuf S, Schulman S. Management and outcomes of major bleeding during treatment with dabigatran or warfarin. Circulation. 2013;128(21):2325-32. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002332

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,095
Tête enseignante GPT0,348
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshare→Même sujetAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→