MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2163312598 · doi:10.1086/651278

A Novel Use for an Old Drug: The Potential for Minocycline as Anti‐HIV Adjuvant Therapy

2010· letter· en· W2163312598 sur OpenAlexaff
Karen F.T. Copeland, James Brooks

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2010
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueHIV Research and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPublic Health Agency of Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMinocyclineMedicineDrugHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)AdjuvantPharmacotherapyPharmacologyImmunologyInternal medicineAntibioticsMicrobiologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In an interesting report in the current issue of Journal, Szeto et al [1] examined the ability of minocycline, a second-generation tetracycline derivative, to attenuate human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 infection and replication by suppressing the activation of CD4+ T cells. Minocycline mediates its antiviral effects by altering the cellular environment rather than via direct effects on HIV-1 replication. This effectively places minocycline in a new class of “anticellular anti-HIV drugs,” as the authors suggest. Minocycline decreased the expression of activation (CD25) and proliferation (Ki-67) markers and reduced the secretion of cytokines (interleukin [IL] 2, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α). Other markers included CD45RA (increased) and CD71, CD11a, and HLA-DR (decreased). The drug did not significantly alter expression of the early activation marker CD69, and the authors suggest that minocycline may target a step downstream of early T cell activation events. Interestingly, CCR5 expression was also reduced, which could contribute to a decrease in HIV-1 replication induced by minocycline in the presence of macrophage- tropic HIV-1. In addition to their antimicrobial action, antibiotics have long been studied for beneficial effects attributed to immunomodulatory activity. In vitro anti-inflammatory effects have been described for almost all classes of antibiotics, but significant clinical research has been focused on the macrolides and tetracyclines. For example, the macrolides, which include erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and azithromycin, inhibit the production of several proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α. These effects are mediated by the inhibition of the transcription factors nuclear factor κB and activator protein 1 [2, 3]. Clinical benefit has been seen with macrolide use among patients with cystic fibrosis [4]. Minocycline treatment markedly reduced the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP) 1, as detected in cerebrospinal fluid in the accelerated simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)/macaque model of HIV-1 infection [5]. MCP-1 is an inflammatory chemokine produced by macrophages and astrocytes in the brain and is implicated in the damage observed in neurodegenerative diseases. In human trials, minocycline has been shown to have neuroprotective effects in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [6], multiple sclerosis [7], and stroke [8]. Of special note, minocycline may be of particular use in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases among individuals with a genetic polymorphism in the MCP-1 promoter, which can result in increased MCP-1 production [9]. Using the accelerated SIV/macaque model of HIV-associated neurological disease, the authors have elsewhere demonstrated beneficial effects of minocycline, including decreases in viral load in plasma and viral RNAin the brain [5]. Minocycline treatment also reduced the severity of CNS disease. In this model a neurovirulent strain and a second immunosuppressive strain of SIV were used to generate enhanced levels of acute infection. The pigtail macaques used in the study had persistently high viral load and rapid CD4+ T cell loss. In addition to anti-HIV-1 effects, minocycline treatment also had anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in the CNS, reducing the incidence and severity of encephalitis. In a more recent macaque study, an examination of brain tissue demonstrated that minocycline reduced levels of astrocyte activation and neurodegenerative markers, including amyloid precursor protein and themitogen-activated protein kinases c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 [10]. The authors showed that the inhibition of p38 activation by minocycline correlated with the suppression of HIV-1 and SIV replication in lymphocytes. However, in macrophages the minocycline-induced inhibition of p38 did not correlate with suppressed virus replication [10]. In another study, minocycline was shown to inhibit nuclear factor κB activation in microglia [11]. The antibiotic was also able to inhibit HIV long terminal repeat—directed transcription in the monocytic cell line U38. Bioinformatic techniques were used to demonstrate that minocycline had high predicted affinity against HIV-1 integrase [12]. Therefore, it is apparent not only that minocycline uses >1 pathway to inhibit HIV-1 replication but also that these pathways may differ depending on the cell type examined. However, the pathway used by minocycline to inhibit HIV replication appears to be distinct from those underlying the neuroprotective effects of the drug. Although more research is required to elucidate its antiviral mechanisms, minocycline has several advantages. It crosses the blood-brain barrier [13–15], which may be important, because current antiretroviral therapies vary in their effectiveness in controlling HIV-1 replication in the CNS [–18]. Minocycline is inexpensive and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Therefore, it may be of value for treating HIV-infected individuals in developed countries, particularly in developing countries where current antiretroviral treatment may not be used owing to lack of availability or prohibitive costs. Currently, the efficacy of minocycline in reducing neurological disease in HIV-infected individuals is being examined in clinical trials in the United States and Africa. Some questions must be resolved to define more clearly the clinical role of minocycline in HIV treatment. For example, it remains unknown whether normally prescribed doses of the antibiotic would achieve serum or cellular levels that would be effective in suppressing HIV-1 replication in vivo. This is important, because the effective dose of minocycline used in the in vitro experiments described by Szeto et al was higher than the levels normally found in serum of treated individuals. Furthermore, it remains to be determined how minocycline may interact with currently used antiretrovirals. One report indicated that minocycline administration reduced the exposure to the protease inhibitor atazanavir [19]. The mechanism underlying this interaction is unknown, as is how potential interactions of minocycline with other antiretroviral drugswould affect the response to antiretroviral treatment. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy has clearly been shown to have beneficial therapeutic and prophylactic effects in HIV-infected children in Africa [20]. The effect of minocycline therapy for HIV infection in resourcepoor countries may be difficult to distinguish from its potential antimicrobial or even antimalarial effects. Finally, considerable research effort has been directed toward purging HIV from latent reservoirs with valproate and other small molecules, in the hope of eradicating the virus [21–24]. The approach of enhancing HIV latency, as demonstrated here by Szeto et al, seemingly runs contrary to the strategy of inducing the virus for eradication purposes. It remains to be seen which approach, if either, will result in long-term clinical benefit for those infected with HIV.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0160,016
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,267 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesMême sujetHIV Research and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207