MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2163334418 · doi:10.1046/j.1442-200x.2002.01623.x

Stenting pulmonary artery stenosis in an infant with tricuspid atresia: Approach via the foramen ovale and ventricular septal defect using a long flexible sheath

2002· article· en· W2163334418 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Kenji Yasuda, Hideshi Tomita, Kohji Kimura, Toshikatsu Yagihara, Shigeyuki Echigo

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatrics International · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Alberta
Mots-clésMedicinePulmonary arteryLeft pulmonary arteryCardiologyStenosisShunt (medical)Pulmonary atresiaStentInternal medicineTricuspid atresiaTricuspid valveSurgeryVentricle

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Stent implantation is now the preferred strategy for pulmonary artery stenosis complicating a congenital heart anomaly. The stent, mounted on a balloon catheter, is usually advanced through a long sheath on a stiff guidewire. Thus, a large sized (at least 9-F) long sheath must be placed at the target site to implant a stent in the pulmonary artery. However, it may be difficult to advance a rigid large sized long sheath to the target because of a complicated or tortuous route. A useful technique for stent deployment for such a lesion using a long flexible sheath is reported. A 2 year and 10-month-old boy with tricuspid atresia (TA), ventricular septal defect (VSD), and pulmonary stenosis developed severe left pulmonary artery stenosis with central pulmonary artery hypertension as a consequence of a previous left modified Blalock−Taussig shunt. He underwent a left modified Blalock−Taussig shunt at 3 months, and a central shunt at 9 months. The left modified Blalock−Taussig shunt was ligated because of excessive pulmonary blood flow after the central shunt (Fig. 1a). Subsequently he underwent a palliative right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with ligation of the central shunt at 1 year and 7 months, because of hypoxia and severe stenosis of the shunt. The narrowest diameter of the stenosis, the proximal pulmonary artery, and the distal left pulmonary artery, measured 2.4, 5.2 and 7.0 mm, respectively. The pressure gradient across the stenosis was 34 mmHg. The catheter approach route via the foramen ovale and VSD, in which the catheter tip must be turned through 180 degrees in the ventricles, made the use of a long sheath extremely difficult. Balloon dilatation was first attempted at 3 years and 1 month and this proved unsuccessful in relieving the stenosis. (a) Left pulmonary angiogram showed left pulmonary stenosis associated with previous left modified Blalock−Taussig shunt. The narrowest diameter was 2.4 mm. (b) The stent was delivered through a patent foramen ovale and ventricular septal defect with a front loading technique using a long flexible sheath. (c) A pulmonary angiogram after stent implantation showed a well dilated stenosis with a diameter of 7.1 mm. Subsequently stent implantation was planned with a front loading technique using a long flexible sheath (Arrow Flex sheath 9-F, 65 cm; Arrow, Pennsylvania, USA) at 3 years and 10 months (Fig. 1b). At that time he weighed 9.3 kg. Under general anesthesia, a 5-F short sheath was placed in the left femoral vein and a 12-F short sheath in the right. The stenosis was crossed with a 6-F wedge balloon catheter from the right femoral vein via the foramen ovale and the VSD. An Amplatz extra stiff guidewire (0.035 inch, 260 cm; Cook, Bloomington, USA) was advanced through the catheter. With a front loading technique, a Palmaz P128 stent was mounted on a Power Flex balloon catheter (balloon diameter, 8 mm; length 2 cm, J & J Cordis; Roden, Netherlands) in the long sheath. Before inserting the long sheath, balloon, and stent assembly, a temporary pacing catheter was placed in the left ventricle from the contralateral groin, in case of critical bradycardia. During the first deployment, we encountered considerable resistance in turning the assembly through 180 degrees to reach the right ventricular outflow tract. Serious bradycardia of 70 beats per min with hypotension to 50 mmHg systole developed. Ventricular pacing was started and stabilized the blood pressure. We conclude that stretching of the atrium, mitral annulus, and ventricle caused the bradycardia and hypotension and subsequently advanced the assembly under continued pacing. The stent successfully dilated the lesion to 7.1 mm (Fig. 1c). No critical hypotension developed at that time and no mitral regurgitation was detected by color Doppler after stent implantation. The right to left lung flow ratio on perfusion scan improved to 1.04, having been 2.81 prior to stent implantation. In TA with VSD, the catheter must be turned through 360 degrees to enter the left pulmonary artery. An ordinary long sheath easily kinks while negotiating such a course in the small infant heart. Furthermore, it is difficult for a metal stent, such as the Palmaz type, to traverse such an acute curve. A front loading technique using a 9-F long flexible sheath and a short stent was chosen to overcome this problem. Vascular access with a 12-F short sheath makes the stent, balloon, and long sheath assembly easy to insert and facilitates repeat attempts. One of our concerns was bradycardia due to stretching of the atrium and mitral annulus while advancing such a large assembly by a complex route. We elected to use an Amplatz extra stiff guidewire that is slightly softer than a Amplatz super stiff guidewire, believing that it would provide sufficient support for the assembly without stretching the heart excessively. The use of temporary pacing increased the safety of the procedure. In conclusion, a front loading technique using a 9-F long sheath is useful to negotiate a complicated route for stent deployment even in small infants. We thank Dr Peter M. Olley, Professor of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, for his assistance with the manuscript.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,192
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,542

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePediatrics InternationalMême sujetCongenital Heart Disease StudiesTravaux en français237 207