Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thank you. Merci. Bonjour. It is certainly a great honour to be here as the Enid Graham Lecturer. I feel quite humbled, and I would like to thank those physiotherapists who nominated me for their confidence and their support. I am grateful to a number of people who helped me prepare for this day by checking facts or finding old photos that we could use, and special thanks go to Joan Walker who coordinated the PowerPoint presentation. When I was writing Head, Heart and Hands,1 the title came fairly easily, but when I was reminded that I would need a title for this lecture, I was at first stumped. As it happened, while I was writing the first draft of my talk I was also preoccupied with a theatre project in Chester, Nova Scotia, and the first heading that sprang to mind was – Head, Heart and Hands: The Musical! It's too bad I couldn't talk any of my musician friends into getting up this early in the morning! Although I am one of the few physiotherapists in this room who has actually met Mrs. Graham, most of you will recognize this photo (Figure 1). It's a pity we don't have a whole slew of photographs of her on file at the Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA). She was a force to be reckoned with, and she personified so clearly the theme chosen for this year's Congress – Innovate, Advance and Lead! Figure 1 Enid Graham was an honoured guest at the celebrations marking CPA's fiftieth anniversary in 1970 Enid Graham's own career as a physiotherapist began when she responded to the need to treat Canadian servicemen injured during World War I. Initially, as a member of the Royal Canadian Army Medical Corps, Mrs. Graham taught rehabilitation techniques at a short course set up at McGill University in 1916. She then went on to be a key player in the creation of Toronto's first physiotherapy school, a temporary programme established in 1917 by the Military Hospital Commission at Hart House.1(p.65) As one of the first leaders in our profession, Mrs. Graham had a great influence on the establishment and advancement of educational opportunities for physiotherapists in the early days. During World War II, Mrs. Graham built on her earlier success with even greater results. As chair of CPA's Military Affairs Committee, she helped organize the recruitment of physiotherapists, who were enlisting in record numbers for service overseas. Because she had been incensed that her “masseuses” (as they were designated) had been denied officer rank in the earlier war (a rank that had been conferred on nursing sisters), Mrs. Graham lobbied successfully to attain officer status for physiotherapists serving in World War II. Of course, it helped that she was married to a prominent physician who was one of her greatest supporters, but, given the temper of the times, this was probably the only way these things could have been achieved. Leaders do know how to take advantage of whatever opportunities are available. Mrs. Graham was a wonderful combination of charm and determination, and she remained vitally interested in the work and achievements of the leaders who followed her. She was very proud to be present at CPA's fiftieth anniversary celebrations in 1970 (see Figure 1). It is now nearly nine decades since she and her colleagues founded CPA, yet her challenge to the physiotherapists of her time – to strive for excellence and promote the profession – is still valid today.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».