North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: The North American AED (antiepileptic drug) Pregnancy Registry was established in 1997 for pregnant women in the United States and Canada at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. The major objective was to obtain, as quickly as possible, information on the frequency of major malformations among infants whose mothers had taken one or more AEDs to prevent seizures or to treat any other medical condition. The highest priority was new information on the many "new" AEDs marketed in the past 10 years. Methods: The eligible woman calls the toll-free number (1-888-233-2334) to obtain information and, we hope, to enroll. She is sent an informed-consent document to review, sign, and return. She is interviewed 3 times: at enrollment (12 min), 7 months' gestation (5 min), and 8 weeks after delivery (5 min). The findings by the doctor of each exposed infant are obtained with the mother's written permission. The study dysmorphologist uses established inclusion/exclusion criteria to identify major malformations (defined as a structural abnormality with surgical, medical, or cosmetic importance). The Scientific Advisory Committee meets separate from the representatives of the sponsoring companies to review anonymously the major findings. Findings in women who have enrolled before having any prenatal screening, a "pure" prospective group, are used to decide when findings should be released. The criterion for release of results for a positive association (relative risk, >1) is met when the lower of the 95% confidence interval (CI) is ≥2.0. The release criterion for no associated increase in the frequency of all major malformations is met when the upper of the 95% confidence limits does not exceed 2.0. The external comparison group is the findings in the Active Malformations Surveillance Program at Brigham and Women's Hospital. The findings in 69,277 newborns, published previously (1), was a baseline rate of 2.24%, which was reduced to 1.62% after excluding infants with genetic disorders and chromosome abnormalities. The major malformations are identified between birth and age 5 days. The inclusion/exclusion criteria are the same as those used in the AED Pregnancy Registry. Results: As of July 12, 2004, total enrollment was 3,708 women; 75% of the women were taking one of 20 different monotherapies, and 63% were "pure" prospective enrollees. The lost-to-follow-up rate has been 3%. The findings have been released for two drugs as monotherapy: phenobarbital (PB) (2) and sodium valproate (VPA) (3), the latter published only as an abstract (an update will be possible after the full results have been published). As of July 12, 2004, six (6.5%) of 92 pure prospective pregnancies with exposure to PB were associated with major malformations (95% CI, 2.4–13.7%). When compared with the background rate (1.62%), a significantly increased risk (RR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.9–8.7%) was noted. Conclusions: A hospital-based pregnancy registry can enroll a significant number of pregnant women who are taking an AED. Many more enrollees are needed to provide the important information needed on many "new" AEDs as monotherapy. Many eligible women do not enroll. We urge all readers to encourage their eligible patients to call 1-888-233-2334 early in pregnancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».