MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2165232962 · doi:10.2113/econgeo.105.8.1411

The Genesis of Distal Zinc Skarns: Evidence from the Mochito Deposit, Honduras

2010· article· en· W2165232962 sur OpenAlexaff
Anthony E. Williams‐Jones, Iain M. Samson, Katherine M. Ault, Joel E. Gagnon, Brian J. Fryer

Notice bibliographique

RevueEconomic Geology · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of WindsorMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSkarnGeologyPyroxeneAndraditeSphaleriteGeochemistryFelsicGrossularIgneous rockFluid inclusionsMineralogyMaficOlivineQuartzPyriteMetamorphic rock

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Mochito deposit, located in Honduras, is a distal Zn(-Pb-Ag) skarn in which economic mineralization (sphalerite and subordinate, argentiferous galena) is found in mantos and chimneys dominated by garnet and pyroxene that replaced limestone and a mixed limestone-siliciclastic unit. Except for a few variably altered, unmineralized diabase dikes, evidence of igneous activity is conspicuously absent. The nearest felsic igneous rocks, volcanic rock units, crop out ~13 km from the deposit. Early skarn and skarn proximal to faults consist dominantly of garnet that evolved from grandite, with a composition of ~Ad55 to andradite (≥Ad90), whereas later skarn, or skarn distal to faults, is mainly made up of pyroxene (Hd70). Magnetite and pyrrhotite locally form between the garnet and pyroxene skarns. Analyses of the whole-rock chemistry show that formation of grandite skarn involved large additions of all major elements (except Ca) and most trace elements, whereas formation of andradite skarn (from grandite skarn) involved losses of most of these elements; the notable exceptions are Ca and Fe, which were added. Mass changes in pyroxene skarn were not evaluated because of the heterogeneous nature of the precursor. Primary fluid inclusions in grandite and associated low-iron sphalerite are interpreted to have been trapped at ~370°C and a pressure of 500 bar. These inclusions have a mean salinity of 14 wt percent NaCl equiv. By contrast, primary inclusions in pyroxene and associated high-iron sphalerite were trapped at ~400°C and have a mean salinity of 5 wt percent NaCl equiv. Fluid inclusions could not be observed in andradite. Small proportions of CO2, CH4, and N2 were detected by gas chromatographic analyses of the fluids released by crushing small samples of the host mineral; CO2 was the most abundant of these gases. Based on LA-ICPMS analyses of individual fluid inclusions, Na and Ca were the principal metals in the fluids (median concentrations of 3.2 wt %), followed by K (0.9 wt %) and Mn (0.3 wt %). Median concentrations of ore metals Zn, Pb, and Ag were 6,000, 900, and 50 ppm, respectively. Analyses of phase equilibria and related thermodynamic calculations indicate that the log f O2 during the grandite and pyroxene skarn stages was >–30.3 and <–30.2, respectively. The pH during the grandite stage was ~5.0. In the absence of reliable data on bulk fluid chemistry, a pH for the pyroxene stage could not be estimated. Based on the calculated Si content of the fluid and the mass addition of Si during grandite skarn formation, the fluid/rock ratio was between 500:1 and 1,000:1. Evaluation of the solubility of sphalerite, galena, and argentite based on the physicochemical characteristics of the putative ore fluid indicate that the ore metals were transported dominantly as chloride complexes and deposited in response to an increase in pH. We propose a model in which relatively oxidizing hydrothermal fluids, exsolving from magma at a depth of >4 km, interacted with graphitic limestones in the Mochito graben during an episode of mid-Tertiary intraplate extension. These fluids rose through faults created by the extension and were cooled by the overlying sedimentary succession. Early skarn formed in an environment of high-fluid flux proximal to the faults and was dominated by grandite because of the oxidizing nature of the fluids. With continued heating of the rocks by subsequent pulses of fluid, temperature increased and the locus of interaction expanded into unaltered limestone distal to the faults, where lower fluid/rock ratios and the presence of graphite promoted buffering of the fluid to lower f O2 and formation of pyroxene skarn. Ore mineral deposition (dominantly sphalerite), which began during or after the formation of grandite skarn, reached its maximum after hydrothermal activity was focused in the lower fluid/rock ratio regime of pyroxene skarn formation, occurring in response to the sharp drop in pH that accompanied neutralization of the fluid by limestone.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,125
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,248

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,187
Écart entre enseignants0,177 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations134
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEconomic GeologyMême sujetGeological and Geochemical AnalysisTravaux en français237 207