Genetic Variation Underlying Protein Expression in Eggs of the Marine Mussel Mytilus edulis
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Study of the genetic basis of gene expression variation is central to attempts to understand the causes of evolutionary change. Although there are many transcriptomics studies estimating genetic variance and heritability in model organisms such as humans there is a lack of equivalent proteomics studies. In the present study, the heritability underlying egg protein expression was estimated in the marine mussel Mytilus. We believe this to be the first such measurement of genetic variation for gene expression in eggs of any organism. The study of eggs is important in evolutionary theory and life history analysis because maternal effects might have profound effects on the rate of evolution of offspring traits. Evidence is presented that the egg proteome varies significantly between individual females and that heritability of protein expression in mussel eggs is moderate to high suggesting abundant genetic variation on which natural selection might act. The study of the mussel egg proteome is also important because of the unusual system of mitochondrial DNA inheritance in mussels whereby different mitochondrial genomes are transmitted independently through female and male lineages (doubly uniparental inheritance). It is likely that the mechanism underlying this system involves the interaction of specific egg factors with sperm mitochondria following fertilization, and its elucidation might be advanced by study of the proteome in females having different progeny sex ratios. Putative identifications are presented here for egg proteins using MS/MS in Mytilus lines differing in sex ratio. Ontology terms relating to stress response and protein folding occur more frequently for proteins showing large expression differences between the lines. The distribution of ontology terms in mussel eggs was compared with those for previous mussel proteomics studies (using other tissues) and with mammal eggs. Significant differences were observed between mussel eggs and mussel tissues but not between the two types of eggs. Study of the genetic basis of gene expression variation is central to attempts to understand the causes of evolutionary change. Although there are many transcriptomics studies estimating genetic variance and heritability in model organisms such as humans there is a lack of equivalent proteomics studies. In the present study, the heritability underlying egg protein expression was estimated in the marine mussel Mytilus. We believe this to be the first such measurement of genetic variation for gene expression in eggs of any organism. The study of eggs is important in evolutionary theory and life history analysis because maternal effects might have profound effects on the rate of evolution of offspring traits. Evidence is presented that the egg proteome varies significantly between individual females and that heritability of protein expression in mussel eggs is moderate to high suggesting abundant genetic variation on which natural selection might act. The study of the mussel egg proteome is also important because of the unusual system of mitochondrial DNA inheritance in mussels whereby different mitochondrial genomes are transmitted independently through female and male lineages (doubly uniparental inheritance). It is likely that the mechanism underlying this system involves the interaction of specific egg factors with sperm mitochondria following fertilization, and its elucidation might be advanced by study of the proteome in females having different progeny sex ratios. Putative identifications are presented here for egg proteins using MS/MS in Mytilus lines differing in sex ratio. Ontology terms relating to stress response and protein folding occur more frequently for proteins showing large expression differences between the lines. The distribution of ontology terms in mussel eggs was compared with those for previous mussel proteomics studies (using other tissues) and with mammal eggs. Significant differences were observed between mussel eggs and mussel tissues but not between the two types of eggs. The potential of proteomics approaches in population and evolutionary biology is gradually being recognized (1Navas A. Albar J.P. Application of proteomics in phylogenetic and evolutionary studies.Proteomics. 2004; 4: 299-302Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 2Biron D.G. Loxdale H.D. Ponton F. Moura H. Marcheé L. Brugidou C. Thomas F. Population proteomics: an emerging discipline to study metapopulation ecology.Proteomics. 2006; 6: 1712-1715Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar). The analysis of the functional significance of variation in gene expression between individuals and populations is an active area of investigation (3Vasemaügi A. Primmer C.R. Challenges for identifying functionally important genetic variation: the promise of combining complementary research strategies.Mol. Ecol. 2005; 14: 3623-3642Crossref PubMed Scopus (232) Google Scholar). Knowledge of the genetic and environmental components of such variation is of central importance for assessment of the roles of selection, mutation, and genetic drift in causing evolutionary change in gene expression profiles (4Nuzhdin S.V. Wayne M.L. Harmon K.L. McIntyre L.M. Common pattern of evolution of gene expression level and protein sequence in Drosophila.Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004; 21: 1308-1317Crossref PubMed Scopus (211) Google Scholar, 5Whitehead A. Crawford D.L. Neutral and adaptive variation in gene expression.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006; 103: 5425-5430Crossref PubMed Scopus (309) Google Scholar, 6Whitehead A. Crawford D.L. Variation within and among species in gene expression: raw material for evolution.Mol. Ecol. 2006; 15: 1197-1211Crossref PubMed Scopus (267) Google Scholar). A number of studies have demonstrated significant variation in gene expression patterns within and between species (for a review, see Ref. 7Ranz J.M. Machado C.A. Uncovering evolutionary patterns of gene expression using microarrays.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006; 21: 29-37Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar). in a study of the marine using transcriptomics of significant variation between individuals within populations with a showing significant differences between populations Crawford D.L. Variation in gene expression within and among natural PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The heritability of gene expression using in a study of heritability of gene expression in using of significant and for of the heritability was A. H. S. A. inheritance of gene expression in 2004; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). studies have genetic variation of in two of and a heritability of gene expression of and of In of the in expression between the maternal effects patterns of in 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). variation for gene expression was observed for of in an analysis of and of the S. analysis of in Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). which be those through the of eggs have and effects on the rate of evolution of offspring The maternal of egg of and Scopus Google Scholar, effects and the of population in Ecol. Scopus Google Scholar, effects and evolution Ecol. 21: Scopus Google Scholar). The egg is of in life history A between egg and number The between and number of Google Scholar, are maternal effects having Biol. Sci. 2006; Google such that in a specific there is a egg that progeny and protein expression patterns might be of high to maternal effects and evolutionary and Although the of studies are on transcriptomics of through of 2006; PubMed Scopus Google and proteomics of abundant proteins and in the egg and on the Biol. Google Scholar, L. Study of proteins in using analysis of 2004; PubMed Scopus Google approaches have to study gene expression in be of importance for the of selection A. for selection of the 15: Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). might have transcriptomics for study because the level of in eggs might not that of the proteins S. of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In abundant through might have a of important L. proteins and 2006; 6: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). proteomics approaches have to egg proteins in S. of an for analysis of eggs using and A. 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The studies on have not to genetic and environmental components of variation in gene is of the study of the marine mussel Mytilus. The mussel Mytilus is an important model in studies of evolution and in the marine mussels are important for F. A. H. F. L. A. the of a stress in mussels using a expression 2006; PubMed Scopus Google and have in studies of population and The and of species in the Scopus Google Scholar, The and of Mytilus and Mytilus and Scholar). the in the of proteomics in marine biology of proteomics in marine Ecol. Scopus Google Scholar, Ecol. Scopus Google mussels are to an important in this The for transcriptomics in Mytilus is being A. a of in tissues of Mytilus PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. A. F. L. C. F. A. of mussel gene expression 2006; PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar, F. L. F. L. A. in mussels using a 2006; PubMed Scopus Google and studies also the of proteomics in mussels and the of proteins between species A. and protein expression of Mytilus and in the of Scopus Google Scholar, A. A to the study of the marine mussels Mytilus and Biol. Scopus Google Scholar, of proteomics in the Mytilus as a model of 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, of protein patterns in a mussel PubMed Scopus Google and between different A. of Mytilus differences in protein expression between and Ecol. Scopus Google Scholar, H. L. C. F. of mussel as an of 2005; PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, S. of of to marine in mussels 2006; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were in studies for of the proteins by was that expression of protein in mussels might be to the stress that mussels A. of Mytilus differences in protein expression between and Ecol. Scopus Google Scholar). mussels are a model system because of unusual mechanism of mitochondrial DNA mitochondrial analysis of of uniparental for genomes are through the female and male lines of a mechanism as uniparental inheritance C. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. in the marine mussel Mytilus PubMed Google Scholar, C. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. unusual of inheritance in the mussel Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). are for which to and are for and a male specific The is transmitted to offspring through the a to study the evolutionary and functional of different of inheritance S. H.D. The unusual system of uniparental inheritance of Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The mechanism of that sperm have a different in mussels to and with that sperm mitochondria in female but the in male L. patterns of sperm mitochondria in of the mussel 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The of male by the and egg and by the C. and female mitochondrial DNA lineages in the mussel species Biol. Evol. Google Scholar, The distribution of and mitochondrial DNA types in tissues of for the of uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial Scopus Google might be by this in but the mechanism underlying and sex is is that egg proteins are and a proteomics study to for protein expression in eggs to male and female be In the present study, a proteomics was of of two lines of the mussel Mytilus in a the first of the measurement of the genetic underlying egg protein expression The are in of previous studies of the genetic of egg and evolutionary and by in mussel eggs are compared with those in egg proteomics and the of to on the mechanism of are female mussels to two lines a were The lines in sex with having high of with and the other females The lines were mussels were in a were in the for egg and occur on an egg proteome differences between individuals not be to the mussels were the and in individual on the of The in was the as that in the mussels were and environmental of eggs were of and and and F. of by for were in in for of the The eggs in were in a and to were eggs in of and and with a using of and with was on to protein for the was and protein was was with the and was with a to for the first proteins the female mussels were by with of protein was for The first was on with a were with in two of with and the of was with using an system was using the a of for the the of the were by using an analysis for of proteins in and the mechanism of 6: Scopus Google a A. of proteins PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were in the to of were to using an The was for of The was for and and showing such as on the were The on was as by The that are not by the a for The number of on the protein were was for by by the the The the that differences between individuals for a specific protein are differences to the A for a specific protein in individual A compared with also a of this protein in the of the between and protein is the were by the for the with the was by the to and the were for on the by the of the for that using F. for in Scopus Google were the and with using the in for for the with was by by The were also by by the of the mussels for and by was of for that is the variance the and were and The is with approaches in the proteomics and the that in that not the distribution A analysis of variance model of was on the for the and using for the are two and The factors and were as and the other factors were as for of variance factors were as for gene expression between a was with the for within for the for within was the within variance components were for within and the variation and were variance and The the of genetic the of Although and a to the distribution the an to a in the and a the for of variance is for were by in using on the Scholar). a was by with and by on the was in the was using the and in and Scholar). not on were also The in between two and the of in between two were for and with by a was with The number of in which the for mussels in were mussels was The of such by the on the of mussels and between lines is The of were using an a using was using an following the The were and using and The was by of in to and The were and to a using and a using a identifications were with with in because of the of Mytilus the number of identifications in number and was using a the with a the of the in in was using a an with a that the any the The was a of with in the for a between A and was by an to of the with for to A and and The was by an system with a system A of was to the a to the and the a and a of were in a in which the first a between and The MS/MS of the abundant in the were was was the with any MS/MS were analysis for The proteins in the were by MS/MS using which compared the a of identifications were by combining the the of protein The of were that the protein with and a of and a of The was the and on species were and the was A protein was a the for the the for for for and for in a with and to be in protein using proteins not The of the the were also compared with on the with a of between the observed and protein were to a Mytilus sequence and Mytilus in using The number of protein observed on the but the were for were present on were present on of of the mussels a of of A. for 2004; 4: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In the present study the and within this It is likely that those were by which to have high expression of proteome analysis Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of the two lines are in The of variance in by was by for the variation is the variance between The is is in the of protein patterns in a mussel PubMed Scopus Google in because of and the of The of variation was the and for The is to in previous variation and variation in PubMed Scopus Google and and with studies of by PubMed Scopus Google a of are for and in the between lines and the variation are with are in The are with those of The of the not and those of the variance components and not suggesting significant genetic and variation with the of of of and for for two and of of within within of in a for in within within in a The and for and were significantly between lines between mussels within lines not the In the the observed of that mussels the two lines is and the the is is significant that there are expression differences between the lines. was on for The factors are within and within was the was first within and within for those within was not The was to for of variance within Significant using of and the and to Scholar, K.L. McIntyre L.M. rate 2005; Scopus Google are in with the number showing a significant those with a significant there is that individual significant differences between lines and between mussels within of protein significant of and with the number showing a significant within within in a the were between lines in and in level as a in to and and is of to Thomas and the importance of for 2005; 4: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, for in protein expression: using 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. C.A. in 2005; 4: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were with a in and in were with a in and in and were with a in and two in for by are in by MS/MS in Mytilus eggs with and and expression in expression in in have significant for the for of is within not is within are the for the to the for the different in to folding and folding and to folding and to folding and folding and of folding and and folding and folding and folding and to the of the protein to folding and folding and protein folding and protein folding and to of of protein folding and mitochondrial expression in expression in in have significant for the for of is within not is within are the for the to the for the different in in a identifications by were on the with a in expression between were by MS/MS on the basis of the and were in and were in F. proteins were with two and the were with were on a with expression between were and proteins were with two to the were with of the were for the might be different different The in a proteomics study be ontology terms relating to protein and such were in the present The first was the protein with the The ontology terms by The PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The was using and on in a number of terms that have for in such DNA is a be to DNA this protein be to mitochondrial DNA is to be proteins are in the in mussel is The protein is a of and be as a this is also in an in the of In is important for the for ontology terms were for the The distribution of terms for the of are in for the and of such on the selection and be a in the of a ontology in a of is not of significant of a might be as a of the underlying population of be with a analysis the that terms within the have of for a in was with to significance and for individual terms this is significance for terms and protein is significant the level a of number of terms in the there is significance and individual significance a for The is significant a but not in the a and ontology terms for protein by MS/MS in Mytilus of protein protein folding and in a The terms were also two to expression in significant by the in the within as significant the and expression between lines of (for two and is the number of A was to significance of in a model is significance for for terms terms and and the individual terms protein stress and folding and are significant a The of ontology terms were also for other studies on mussel tissues A. and protein expression of Mytilus and in the of Scopus Google Scholar, A. A to the study of the marine mussels Mytilus and Biol. Scopus Google Scholar, A. of Mytilus differences in protein expression between and Ecol. Scopus Google Scholar, H. L. C. F. of mussel as an of 2005; PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar, S. of of to marine in mussels 2006; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google and mammal eggs of abundant proteins and in the egg and on the Biol. Google Scholar, L. Study of proteins in using analysis of 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, L. proteins and 2006; 6: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The for individual proteins are in and for and terms in the number of for a was not in the to as and are that the of a protein was a of of the number of for this the terms have within were to the distribution of terms in with that in and The of with was significant for with the significantly in and the significantly in in a The for significant variation in gene expression between as by the a of and and a analysis to the of as a The varies between (for and (for In to of genetic the is of other that for not the that there is genetic variation underlying The to the of are the and variance and the variance to to Scholar). In the present study, the mussels were in the to and the that not to the between and heritability the heritability of gene expression in this study a a different of individual mussels have in of by on the of the different as to an heritability might in be equivalent to the number of mussels Although many studies have on egg in to life history evolutionary egg proteome variation not in this Knowledge of the and genetic variation for egg is important for the of might change in evolution and heritability of in Evol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is to in marine rate with egg with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). there is a to more might the of by on be for for the the and is with by proteins in and Biol. 2005; Scholar). In the mussel Mytilus variation in egg and was between individual females within populations in egg and among PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of variation for egg is with the present study on significant variation in protein expression is the evolutionary is more to the to which this variation a genetic are of moderate to high heritability for egg and heritability of in Evol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google and H. and of egg in a Evol. Biol. 21: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Wayne M.L. for egg in the Ecol. Scopus Google Scholar, and genetic and of egg in Sci. 2005; PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar). that egg have potential to to natural The present study is the first to an of heritability for proteome profiles in eggs in a natural The a moderate to high for a in with the for other egg traits. It is important to that the of proteomics by differences between individuals in the of a are to the for the Although a heritability potential for evolutionary a is that to for to have heritability those to Scholar, selection and the heritability of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The of this for the rate of natural selection are the heritability of life history PubMed Google Scholar, and heritability in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, of variance underlying in a natural population of the 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The evolutionary significance of moderate to high heritability for egg protein expression an and on the functional significance of egg proteins and analysis is a in the of functional differences and sequence PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of expression differences of specific proteins between tissues is in proteome studies. the of specific protein terms be in the for a and the of specific It might be that a between mussel and mammal eggs a in the differences in are to the proteins in and Biol. 2005; in The and of mussel eggs in a and might on proteins in to stress such as in analysis of significant differences in the distribution of ontology terms between mussel and mammal eggs. In in types of terms with stress response and protein folding and in and the have the and The of the significantly of the in mussel eggs compared with mussel be but its is The stress a significantly in mussel in eggs. In this proteins in stress are those in protein folding and The is abundant in mussel because the studies were more on other of many of proteins were a in mussel studies that this The protein by in many proteomics studies on organisms are likely to be those proteins that are abundant because are on the and those that are in the In the present study, for was compared by between of are by MS/MS and those but not and those not lines the by significantly those in the other two which were using the significant the here by MS/MS have significantly those not high proteins are likely to be that might be between species and also proteins differing in expression between tissues be as for functional analysis because of the that many proteins have Sci. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The protein terms in the present and the mammal egg and mussel studies were also using PubMed and a in which there is A of in 2005; 6: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, L. in Biol. 4: Scopus Google for in to the of D.G. patterns to 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, H. the for PubMed 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The potential functional importance of an interaction between two terms be by the of of two terms in PubMed this is the basis of such as H. S. to for proteins PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The number of PubMed were for protein in the The were but terms relating to egg also an of the A high number of in the a high for the a high of of the protein and terms in the The was to the of the of and the between and In the first proteins to proteins to and proteins by and In the this was for In the for those proteins by the two was proteins are and by and and mitochondrial and by and for and are the differences the are and and for are and the proteins are high in the are and proteins important in and with the and proteins in types of egg two and that the terms in types of eggs are those that are frequently in studies of eggs and in the A for proteins in mussel eggs to the mechanism of In the present study the two mussel lines and in the sex of is not a as there is variation in the sex of between mussels natural populations C. uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial DNA and in the mussel Mytilus PubMed Google Scholar). The proteins showing differences between the lines might be for in the and expression might have with the sex mechanism involves the of mitochondria eggs and sperm and interaction of with which might might not be to mitochondrial The mitochondrial DNA system of the mussel PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in and the might a for in the of mitochondria in Mytilus male and female are L. patterns of sperm mitochondria in of the mussel 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In the present study, terms relating to stress response and protein folding and and the were significantly more in mussel eggs were other terms between of terms to different terms relating to and stress response proteins have a in the having in expression between proteins to the of such as and have in the The individual showing the expression between lines might be for investigation the causes of a be in that differences in and of might different The of are by It is observed with differences between lines of in in and in any the functional significance of be different were by the compared with of and studies the proteome of eggs of females the population as female male It is that a of such studies egg proteins in to be such proteins have an with might important to the functional with
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle