MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2165458345

A DISTANCE DELIVERY MODEL TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY TO POST-DIPLOMA BACCALAUREATE LEVEL DENTAL HYGIENE EDUCATION

2000· dissertation· en· W2165458345 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Sandra J Cobban

Notice bibliographique

RevueAUSpace (Athabasca University) · 2000
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineDentistry
ThématiqueDental Research and COVID-19
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAthabasca University
Mots-clésDental hygieneHygieneMedical educationMedicineDentistry
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dental hygiene practice is grappling with change as it adapts to the rapidly evolving health care delivery system, and dental hygiene education must respond to the changing needs of its graduates. Dental hygienists and the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association see a need for increasing access to baccalaureate degree dental hygiene education in Canada. Changes in student demographics require flexibility in curriculum delivery. A post-diploma baccalaureate degree program for dental hygienists that is available by distance delivery methods is one mechanism by which to increase access to post-diploma baccalaureate educational opportunities. The purposes of this study were to identify the challenges dental hygienists face as potential learners, to propose a model for a post-diploma dental hygiene baccalaureate degree-completion program for delivery by distance methods, and to suggest appropriate distance delivery methods for courses that would lead to a baccalaureate degree. To achieve these purposes, two surveys were undertaken. A survey of a stratified random sample of 668 members of the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association was conducted to identify learning preferences of dental hygienists who would enrol in a post-diploma baccalaureate degree program. Fifty-seven post-diploma dental hygiene baccalaureate degree programs in Canada and the United States were surveyed to determine the curriculum content and delivery mechanisms of these programs. Response rates were 57.6% for the survey of dental hygienists and 57.9% for the survey of the dental hygiene programs. Dental hygienists are motivated to pursue baccalaureate education by a desire for increased knowledge and for personal satisfaction. They are constrained in their pursuits by a need for flexibility in scheduling, and by family and work obligations. Dental hygienists perceive the barriers or constraints to have a stronger influence than the motivators, as evidenced by higher mean scores in their ratings of these factors. They prefer to pursue baccalaureate education by means of correspondence, computer-based communication/Internet, or evening or weekend classes in their home communities. They are not interested in full-time study or weekend classes in a distant community. They have access to and are comfortable using computers and e-mail. Current dental hygiene post-diploma degree programs are not accessible by the delivery methods that dental hygienists indicate they prefer. Current post-diploma baccalaureate dental hygiene degree programs were most likely to be 120 semester hour credits in length, transfer 60 credits from the diploma, more with an articulation agreement, have a residency requirement of 30 credits, and require a minimum grade point average and National Board exam for admission. They were not likely to require a clinical component but were likely to offer specialization components. They offer a blend of advanced dental hygiene and liberal studies, but were not likely to offer the program by distance delivery methods. A model, including program specifications and a sample curriculum, has been proposed for distance delivery of a post-diploma baccalaureate dental hygiene degree.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,672
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2000
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAUSpace (Athabasca University)Même sujetDental Research and COVID-19Travaux en français237 207