MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2166555080

Cost benefit analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

2015· article· en· W2166555080 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barot C. Gaurangkumar

Notice bibliographique

RevueAdvances In Management · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCorporate social responsibilitySocial responsibilityAccountabilityPublic relationsBusinessBusiness ethicsCompliance (psychology)AccountingCorporate governanceLaw and economicsEconomicsLawPolitical scienceFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AbstractThe role of new manager in 21st century is very crucial in field nowadays. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a process with the aim to embrace for the company's and to encourage a positive impact through its activities on the environment, consumers, employees, communities, stakeholders and all other members of the public sphere who may also be considered stakeholders. The has to spend at least 2 percentages for the activities of CSR.Corporate social CSR, also called conscience, citizenship, social performance, or sustainable responsible business/ Responsible Business) is a form of self-regulation integrated into a business model. CSR policy functions as a built-in, self-regulating mechanism whereby a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law, ethical standards and international norms. In some models, a firm's implementation of CSR goes beyond compliance and engages in actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by Law.Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, Business Accountability.IntroductionThe term corporate social responsibility became popular in the 1960s and has remained a term used indiscriminately by many to cover legal and moral more narrowly construed. Proponents argue that corporations make more long term profits by operating with a perspective while critics argue that CSR distracts from the economic role of businesses. McWilliams and Siegel's article1 published in Strategic Management Journal, cited by over 1000 academics, compared existing econometric studies of the relationship between social and financial performance. They concluded that the contradictory results of previous studies reporting positive, negative and neutral financial impact were due to flawed empirical analysis.McWilliams and Siegel16'17 demonstrated that when the model is properly specified; that is, when you control for investment in Research and Development, an important determinant of financial performance, CSR has a neutral impact on financial outcomes. In his widely cited book entitled Misguided Virtue: False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility, David Henderson14 argued forcefully against the way in which CSR broke from traditional value-setting? He questioned the lofty and sometimes unrealistic expectations in CSR.Some argue that CSR is merely window-dressing, or an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful multinational corporations. Political sociologists became interested in CSR in the context of theories of globalization, neo-liberalism and late capitalism. Adopting a critical approach, sociologists emphasize CSR as a form of capitalist legitimacy and in particular point out what has begun as a social movement against uninhibited power has been co-opted by and transformed by corporations into a 'business model' and a 'risk management' device, often with questionable results CSR is titled to aid an organization's mission as well as a guide to what the company stands for and will uphold to its consumers.Development business ethics is one of the forms of applied ethics that examines ethical principles and moral or ethical problems that can arise in a busmess environment. ISO 26000 is the recognized international standard for CSR. Public sector organizations (the United Nations for example) adhere to the triple bottom line (TBL). It is widely accepted that CSR adheres to similar principles but with no formal act of legislation.ApproachesSome commentators have identified a difference between the Canadian (Montreal school of CSR), the Continental European and the Anglo-Saxon approaches to CSR. It is said that for Chinese consumers, a socially responsible company makes safe, high-quality products; for Germans it provides secure employment; in South Africa it makes a positive contribution to social needs such as health care and education. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,051

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,083
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations14
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAdvances In ManagementMême sujetCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingTravaux en français237 207