Comparison of Surgeon and Physiotherapist-Directed Ponseti Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Increasingly, the Ponseti method has been adopted worldwide as the preferred method of managing idiopathic clubfoot deformity. Following the successful implementation of the Ponseti method by orthopaedic surgeons in our institution, a clubfoot clinic was established in 2003. This clinic is directed by a physiotherapist who, using the Ponseti protocol, performs the serial cast treatment and supervises the brace management of all children with idiopathic clubfoot deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of physiotherapist-directed with surgeon-directed Ponseti cast treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with idiopathic clubfoot deformity treated from 2002 to 2006 and followed for a minimum of two years. Twenty-five children (thirty-four clubfeet) treated by surgeons were compared with ninety-five children (137 clubfeet) treated by a physiotherapist. The outcomes that were evaluated included the number of casts required, the rate of percutaneous Achilles tenotomy, the rate of recurrence, the failure rate, and the need for additional surgical procedures. RESULTS: At the time of presentation, the patients in the two groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, laterality of the clubfoot, and history of treatment. The mean duration of follow-up was thirty-four months in the physiotherapist-directed group and forty-eight months in the surgeon-directed group. No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to the mean number of initial casts, the Achilles tenotomy rate, or the failure rate. Recurrence requiring additional treatment occurred in 14% of the feet in the physiotherapist-directed group and in 26% of the feet in the surgeon-directed group (p = 0.075). Additional procedures, including repeat Achilles tenotomy or a limited posterior or posteromedial release, were required in 6% of the feet in the physiotherapist-directed group and in 18% of those in the surgeon-directed group (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, the Ponseti method of cast treatment of idiopathic clubfeet was as effective when it was directed by a physiotherapist as it was when it was directed by a surgeon, with fewer recurrences and a less frequent need for additional procedures in the physiotherapist-directed group. The introduction of the physiotherapist-supervised clubfoot clinic at our institution has been effective without compromising the quality of care of children with clubfoot deformity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».