Ustekinumab is effective and safe in the treatment of Crohn’s disease refractory to anti-TNFα in an orthotopic liver transplant patient
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Sir, Hepatobiliary disorders may be an extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The most common associated liver disease is primary sclerosing cholangitis (1–14%), followed by non-specific chronic hepatitis, chronic hepatitis C and non-alcoholic fatty liver.1 These conditions can progress towards end-stage liver disease and require orthotopic liver transplantation. We present the case of a 44-year-old male diagnosed in 1992 with Crohn’s disease (CD) with ileocecal involvement and an inflammatory pattern (A2L3B1 of the Montreal classification) refractory to corticosteroids, and which required ileocecal resection with ileocolic anastomosis. Subsequently, cryptogenic cirrhosis was diagnosed and liver transplantation was performed in 1998, with immune suppression in the form of tacrolimus. In 2001 the patient suffered from postoperative recurrence of IBD that was treated with prednisolone and 5-acetylsalicylic acid, with a good response. Since 2003 he had experienced multiple relapses, and anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) treatment with adalimumab was started in 2011. The patient responded favourably, though in 2012 the treatment was switched to infliximab due to a loss of response, and to certolizumab in 2013 for the same reason. In 2014 he was admitted due to a severe flare-up. Colonoscopy revealed left segmental colitis with ulcers and a simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) of 7 points in the affected segment (Figure 1 After discarding infectious processes, treatment was started with intravenous corticosteroids and ustekinumab at a dose of 90 mg/week via the subcutaneous route for 1 month, followed by maintenance therapy with 45 mg/month via the subcutaneous route. The course proved favourable, and after 12 months of treatment the patient showed clinical remission, without corticosteroids, and endoscopy showed mucosal healing. There were no rejection problems or associated infectious processes. In patients with IBD before solid organ transplantation, the disease takes a more aggressive course, with greater resistance to medical treatment and a higher percentage of colectomies.2,3 The early introduction of 5-aminosalicylates after transplantation and the use of azathioprine appear to exert a protective effect.3 Regarding the use of anti-TNFα drugs, the scientific evidence is limited, but the literature reports clinical response rates of up to 87%, with mucosal healing in up to 42% of cases.4 Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeted to the p40 subunit of interleukin 12–23, resulting in inhibition of its mechanism of action. This drug has not been approved for use in CD, though there are preliminary clinical trials that suggest its usefulness in patients with CD refractory to anti-TNFα therapy.5 Our case is the first published report of a patient with CD and orthotopic liver transplantation refractory to anti-TNFα therapy in which ustekinumab proved effective and safe. No specific funding has been received for the present work. There is no conflict of interest to declare by the authors. All authors contributed equally.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».