MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2169166746 · doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.33601_2.x

Midline Spikes in Children and Clinical Correlations

2002· letter· en· W2169166746 sur OpenAlexaff
Sue Sanders, Shaun Rowlinson, Michael Koutroumanidis, C D Ferrie, C. P. Panayiotopoulos

Notice bibliographique

RevueEpilepsia · 2002
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Établissements canadiensSt. Thomas Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSemiologyElectroencephalographyPsychologyEpilepsyMedicineAudiologyNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Kutluay et al. (1) highlighted midline spikes and associated seizure semiology, a subject that has previously received little attention, as reviewed elsewhere (2). Midline spikes alone were found in 35 (0.2%) of 20,000 EEGs. These commonly occurred in children and were significantly associated with heterogeneous types of focal and generalized seizures of idiopathic (16 cases), symptomatic (13), or undetermined cause (6). Onset of seizures was mainly between ages 1 and 6 years (21 of 35 cases) (1). Midline spikes were facilitated by sleep or occasionally seen only during sleep (1). We supplement these observations with our results from an ongoing prospective study from 1998 (3,4). At the end of the first 3 years, we had recorded 424 EEGs in 308 children aged 1–14 years; 228 (74%) had one or more epileptic seizures. All EEGs were recorded digitally, which allows optimal study of midline and other spike locations; in old paper EEGs, midline spikes are not detected in montages that do not include midline electrodes. Of 228 patients with seizures, 21 (9.2%) had at least one EEG with midline spikes alone (six, or 2.6%) or together with spikes in other, usually multiple, locations (15, or 6.6%). Midline spikes were frequently of high amplitude and in clusters but could also be small, singular, and sparse (Fig. 1). For comparison, occipital spikes alone or with other, including midline, spikes were found in 36 (16%) cases. Centrotemporal spikes alone or with other, including midline, spikes were found in 48 (21%) cases. Top: EEGs of a child with Panayiotopoulos syndrome. At age 9 years, he had pure autonomic status epilepticus that lasted for 4 h. He felt tired, complained of headache, became agitated, and was very pale. Within 5 min, he started banging his head on the wall and soon became unresponsive and floppy "like a rag doll." He was doubly incontinent, his eyes were widely open, and pupils were markedly dilated. At this stage, he vomited vigorously. Recovery without convulsions started 4 h from onset. He did not convulse at any stage. One day a year later, he had two left-sided rolandic seizures of unilateral facial twitching, each lasting 5–10 min. The first EEG had only midline spikes at Cz electrode, occasionally forming an ill-defined dipole with F4 positivity. The second EEG had centrotemporal spikes forming a dipole with midline positivity. There were no midline spikes. Occasionally a positive occipital spike also was recorded. The third EEG had infrequent and scattered small spikes mainly at O2 and C3 electrodes. Bottom: Interictal EEGs of three children with typical seizures of Panayiotopoulos syndrome. Left: Repetitive multifocal spike–wave complexes with midline spikes. Middle: Independent multifocal spikes at various locations including midline spikes. Right: First EEG had predominantly midline spikes alone or synchronous with other spikes, but the second EEG 4 months later had multifocal spikes in other than midline locations. Five of the six patients with at least one EEG having midline spikes only had normal development. These had febrile seizures (one case), rolandic epilepsy (one), Panayiotopoulos syndrome (one), occipital and a single complex partial seizure (one), and brief seizures with loss of consciousness only (one). The only symptomatic case had generalised convulsions. In follow-up EEGs of these 6 children, none of them had only midline spikes alone (fig). Instead, midline spikes occurred together with centrotemporal, occipital or other spikes in various combinations (3 patients), disappeared but spikes were seen in other locations (1) or EEGs were normalised (2). Significantly, of the 21 patients with midline spikes alone or in combination with other spikes, six had definite Panayiotopoulos syndrome (another four were possible cases of the same syndrome) manifesting with single or infrequent autonomic seizures, autonomic status epilepticus, or both (4,5). Conversely, midline spikes were present in 15% of patients with this syndrome (4). Our results are generally in agreement with those of Kutluay et al. (1), but it appears that midline spikes (a) are much more frequent than previously appreciated (which is attributed to improved detection with digital EEGs); (b) usually occur together with spikes in other locations; more rarely, they occur alone, but this is not a consistent localisation in serial EEGs of the same patient; and (c) are significantly associated with benign childhood focal seizures and particularly with Panayiotopoulos syndrome. From a practical point of view, an EEG with midline and multifocal spikes in a normal child with a single or a few seizures should raise the possibility of benign childhood seizures and particularly of Panayiotopoulos syndrome of autonomic seizures and autonomic status epilepticus (2,4,5).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEpilepsiaMême sujetNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyTravaux en français237 207