MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W216960250

Education - the Neglected Tool of Indian Diplomacy

2012· article· en· W216960250 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Sharma

Notice bibliographique

RevueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNAL · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSuperpowerSoft powerPolitical scienceEconomic growthDiplomacyChinaHuman rightsGlobalizationDemocracyHigher educationInternational educationDevelopment economicsPublic administrationPoliticsEconomicsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Education is an important component of soft-power diplomacy. The Delores report of the International Commission on Education for the 21st Century1 emphasizes the immense potential of higher education to use globalization as a tool for bridging the knowledge gap and enrich the dialogue between peoples and cultures. Exposure of the youth to a liberal environment and a pluralistic democracy like India promotes the cause of human rights and democracy. Capacity building is the biggest challenge for the development of the poorer countries of the South. India, with its unique location and a long tradition of knowledge power, can play a useful part in capacity building in these countries.The quality of education offered by a state has become an important barometer of its standing in the international arena. Can a nation seek a place at the high table without internationalization of its higher education? It is hardly surprising that USA, the sole superpower, has also been the leading education power since the end of World War II. Recognizing the importance of education in the international power hierarchy and its role in the pursuit of national interests, developed countries, particularly USA, UK, France, Australia, Canada and Germany, have given renewed emphasis to internationalization of higher education, actively supporting the efforts of their universities to recruit foreign students. In Asia, China, Korea, Japan and Singapore have also stepped up their efforts to attract students from abroad.It is estimated that the demand for international education would increase fourfold over two decades, from 1.8 million students in 2002 to 7.2 million by 2025. The global education market is estimated to be worth US$ 2.2 trillion. Table 1 provides a brief summary of the foreign students studying in various countries and their contribution to the economy and employment.Education Diplomacy Around the WorldUSAIt is seen from Table 1 that the USA is the most preferred education destination in the world. Education diplomacy has been one of the bright spots in the United States' somewhat dismal record of foreign policy. USA has attracted bright immigrants from every part of the world through its campuses. Internationalization of higher education has played a significant role in making the US the number one knowledge power of the world. US universities have been able to create highly influential alumni networks all over the world that have been instrumental in promoting US foreign policy goals and commercial interests. The President of Taiwan was able to visit USA to attend an alumni function,2 which would otherwise not have been possible because of the United States' 'One China' policy.The economic faculties and US education have deeply influenced the economic thinking and policies of most of the nations and international institutions like the World Bank, IMF, etc. Education diplomacy has been a major asset in the field of intelligence as well. The alumni networks have been successfully used for certain diplomatic objectives. The alumni have also contributed generously to their alma mater. For example, in 2011, Ratan Tata donated $50 million to Harvard Business School; Anand Mahindra donated $10 million to Harvard for its Humanities Center.EuropeThe UK too has effectively leveraged the alumni network of foreign students for promoting its commercial, political and economic interests and for attracting talent to provide it a competitive edge. Many scholarship programmes are available for higher studies in the UK through British Council offices all over the world.3 Australia and Canada have accorded high priority to attracting foreign students particularly from the Afro-Asian region. Their numbers have risen rapidly in the last ten years. They have also made significant contributions to the economy and employment generation and have been a major source of quality migration.In France, foreign students constitute approximately 12 per cent of students in higher education. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,536
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,716

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNALMême sujetGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsTravaux en français237 207