Heterointegration of compound III-V semiconductors by wafer bonding and layer splitting for optoelectronic applications
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In recent years, the use of III-V nitride compound semiconductors such as GaN, AlN, and InN has seen a rapid growth in the optoelectronics industry. Due to the efficient emission of light based on their direct bandgap several compound semiconductors are attractive for hybrid devices for optoelectronic and photovoltaic applications. It is widely acknowledged that the exploitation of the full potential of these emerging technologies is held back primarily by the high cost of prime grade crystalline quality material and the relative small wafer diameters available. On top of these challenges commercially available epitaxial samples suffer from high defectivity, because of the large lattice mismatch between these semiconductors and the commonly used sapphire substrate. In this context wafer bonding provides an alternative approach to integrate dissimilar material systems with superior crystal quality devoid of epitaxial lattice defects and at reasonable cost. The heterogeneous integration process combines semiconductor wafer bonding technology with the ion cutting process by hydrogen implantation in order to achieve novel composite material systems that are unattainable by conventional epitaxy techniques <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> . One of the possibilities to reduce the material cost would be the application of the ion-cut process to cleave several thin layers from the same wafer and their transfer onto foreign and cheap substrates. In principle, this ion-cut, a generic process based on light ion (using H or He) implantation and wafer bonding, can be used to transfer bulk quality fine layers onto foreign substrates thereby achieving heterostructures frequently unattainable by other methods such as epitaxy. The transfer of several layers from the initial starting wafer affords a significant reduction of the material cost. Avoiding conventional epitaxy techniques with their inherent lattice mismatch challenges when marrying dissimilar semiconductor materials constitutes a major advantage for the wafer bonding and layer transfer technology. There are two approaches to affect the bonding of dissimilar materials. In the first approach the wafers are directly bonded without the use of an intermediate layer. In the second case bonding is achieved via an intermediate layer, which is a dielectric layer in most applications. Following successful bonding of dissimilar materials the heterointegration process will be completed by release of a thin layer of the III-V semiconductor. The release and transfer of such thin layers to foreign substrates is accomplished by cleaving ion implanted III-V samples. The state-of-the-art technique is to implant, the compound semiconductor samples by H or He energetic ions to create a mechanically weak zone a below the surface of the donor wafer <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> . The influence of the implant fluence, the post implant annealing conditions required for the layer transfer and the resulting material modifications weakening the cleavage zone will be reviewed. Systematic studies of the influence of thermal treatment and implant dose on cleavage behavior have been performed with high resolution TEM cross-sectional analysis combined with other relevant physical characterization techniques <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> . Fig. 1 displays the example of AlN, where the hardness increases with annealing temperature rendering the III-V material more brittle. This presentation provides new insights in the mechanical behavior of hydrogen implanted III-V semiconductors throughout subsurface microcracking leading to thin film transfer following heterogeneous wafer bonding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».