MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2170269720 · doi:10.1176/pn.41.8.0011

CANDIDATES FOR RECORDER

2006· article· en· W2170269720 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald M. Burd

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueHealthcare Systems and Technology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWifePsychologyValue (mathematics)Medical educationMedicinePolitical scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Association NewsFull AccessCANDIDATES FOR RECORDERRonald M. Burd, M.D.Ronald M. Burd, M.D.Published Online:21 Apr 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.41.8.0011Biographical Statement I was raised on a farm in Montana. There I learned to work hard, support others, and always look for a better way. I also learned the value of thinking for a living. My parents, family, and community provided my foundation of values and ideals.This developed my practical approach to being and doing. I learned to trust results, not rhetoric. Discipline, commitment, and self-challenge developed and are part of my daily routine.I did my psychiatry residency at Mayo. On completion, I joined a large multispecialty group in Fargo and work there still. My practice is broad ranging, including inpatient (especially CD and mood disorders) and outpatient. Administratively I have worked in quality improvement and the last two years as department chair. Currently, I also work on contract with the colleges, with BCBSND, CD providers, and many years as clinical faculty with UNDSOM, teaching both medical students and residents.During this time, I have been blessed with the companionship of my wonderful wife, Kim, and we have raised two accomplished daughters who are in college, one of whom is seeking a career in medicine."Community" is important to me, both as support and an opportunity to give back. This is reflected in my activity over the years with my partners, church, schools, charitable activities, and professional organizations. I count myself as particularly blessed within the APA community through the acquaintances I have made in the Assembly and the mentors I have acquired there over the years.I have clear values and a vision for the common good. I will continue to work hard, think, support our profession, and search for innovative solutions to the challenges facing psychiatrists. I will strive to keep APA a home to psychiatrists and work for access, nondiscriminatory coverage, and quality care.Candidacy StatementLeadership involves many attributes, including the ability to synthesize goals, create plans, and carry those plans through.I am running for leadership within the Assembly, as recorder. My reasons and what I bring to the job follow.I love what I do. It is such a privilege, gift, and honor to treat my patients, share their lives, and practice my profession.Unfortunately, my practice is changing, reflecting the challenges to our APA.Make no mistake; political, economic, and social forces threaten treatment of mental illness and substance use disorders. We see this today in declining reimbursements, limited access, scope-of-practice issues, erosion of community and public psychiatric infrastructure, and medicine's declining political influence. Increasingly, care is unavailable, and much psychiatric care is provided in jails and prisons. Conversely, the "treatment" of sexual offenders is provided in public psychiatric institutions. These shifts are evident everywhere.Access is therefore our foremost patientcare issue. We must challenge our society to match resources to needs. Facets of this include scope of practice, parity, and dealing with the underinsured and uninsured. Our challenge is to ensure that our patients get excellent psychiatric care, with real and meaningful access. We need to continue to work toward APA positions verbalized on universal access and nondiscrimination for mental health benefits.I have extensive Assembly and APA leadership experience. For eight years I have been on the Assembly Executive Committee, working with other APA leaders, learning the environment, and practicing the "art of the possible." During my five years as Area rep, Area 4 has increased the involvement of DB MITs and LRs. Our current project is to involve more women members in DB, Area, and Assembly activities. While chair of the Committee on Procedures, the Procedural Code was extensively rewritten and the committee established as the interpreter of the Procedural Code. On the RUC I have represented APA in developing coding recommendations to CMS.I have proven leadership ability in developing strategy, operational delivery, and tactical creativity.As individuals and professionals, we are defined more by what we do than what we say. The "truth" of our ideals of medical prescribers, fair reimbursement for our work, and access to care will not defend themselves, and undefended will not survive the political process.Vaclav Havel said, "Vision is not enough; it must be combined with venture. It is not enough to stare up the steps: we must step up the stairs." Time to step up the stairs!Our action must be to engage in the political process. We must engage legislators, regulators, policymakers, nonpsychiatric M.D.s, and the general public, and then align them in support of our goals. Each and every psychiatrist has some role in this. We need to create this expectancy, model it to each other, and provide the structure and guidelines to support the effort.I ask for your vote and your trust. As recorder of the Assembly, I will continue to bring my energy, enthusiasm, and experience to the APA leadership.Thank you.THE APA ASSEMBLY will elect a speaker-elect and a recorder at its May meeting in Toronto. The candidates for these positions were asked to provide Psychiatric News with biographical and candidacy statements. These statements are published here to keep APA members informed of the candidates' views and encourage APA members to contact their Assembly representatives about the election. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,379
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,972

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetHealthcare Systems and TechnologyTravaux en français237 207