Re: Diogenes Syndrome in a Pair of Siblings
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Editor: We refer to the interesting letter from Dr Esposito and colleagues in France, describing 2 siblings who lived in severe domestic squalor (1). One was an unmarried woman, aged 61 years; the other was her brother, aged 58 years and suffering from a physical handicap. The authors state that Diogenes syndrome is rare in a pair of siblings and that the few reported cases of a pair living together all concerned married couples. We agree that the frequency of cases of severe domestic squalor encountered by health workers in the community is not reflected in a comparable number of reports in the medical literature. However, we are also aware of various reports that refer to cases wherein 2 or more persons were found to be living together in squalor. We have identified at least 70 reported cases of 2 or more people mentioned or described as living together in a state of severe domestic squalor (references available on request). In research undertaken by one of us, 15 of 81 people living in squalid conditions shared their accommodation with other people (2). Among them were 5 couples and a family of 3, all of whom were included in the sample. Another of the 15 subjects was a mother whose son sometimes lived with her but was thought not to be responsible for much, if any, of the squalor. The 15th was a female homeowner who lived in severe squalor but whose boarder lived in a separate, and much cleaner, part of the house. With specific reference to siblings living together, we found 4 case reports in addition to 5 pairs of siblings mentioned in a series of cases of Diogenes Syndrome or severe domestic squalor. One case report is that of a man, aged 73 years, who was bedridden with severe arthritis and lived with his sister, aged 77 years (3,4). Another report concerned a single woman, aged 50 years, who suffered from mild developmental disability and lived in squalor in the downstairs rooms of a house she shared with her sister, who occupied the upstairs and thus (it is implied) mostly escaped the squalor (5). The case of 2 sisters who lived in a rural area in uninhabitable conditions and who resisted services or assistance has been described in Spanish (6). Perhaps most striking of all is the case of the hermits of Harlem. Granick and Zeman referrred to these individuals in their research on 105 newspaper reports (published from 1942 to 1959) of aged recluses living in New York (7), and they were also referred to in lay accounts of the strange and unusual (8). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».