Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Well-documented appraisal decisions, based on established archival theory and practice, and appropriately taken within a legal and policy framework, are essential in a government context, as archivists are increasingly held directly accountable by society for their recommendations to preserve or destroy records.An examination of Canadian federal records disposition and appraisal methodology and its documentation shows a long-term evolutionary progression through several different eras.Experience gained through the practice of appraisal within the most recent era, combined with research into the development of Canadian federal records disposition practices over the past 40 years (including evidence from the archival holdings and operational records of Library and Archives Canada) demonstrates that there are fundamental principles and key concepts that can and should support appraisal documentation.Such documentation, it is argued, should also be based on four core components -context, description, analysis, and decision -regardless of the specific methodology, process, or approach that an archives might use.It is argued that these principles, concepts, and components, rooted in history and actual practices, should be the foundation for the documentation necessary to account for appraisal decisions.All nineteen of the commission's site visit reports are found in LAC, RG 35/R77-4-7, vol., bound volume, "Minutes of the proceedings of the Departmental Commission appointed to enquire into and report upon the state of the Public Records, 897"; they are also repeated in the commission's published report. 2 LAC, RG 35/R77-4-7, vol., bound volume, "Minutes of the proceedings of the Departmental Commission appointed to enquire into and report upon the state of the Public Records, 897," Joseph Pope (Under-Secretary of State) to Henry C. Maxwell Lyte (Deputy Keeper of the Records), 7 February 897. 3 Ibid., J.J. [Carkowski] to Joseph Pope, 4 March 897, .4 LAC, RG 35/R77-4-7, vol., file "pt.2, 'Rules for the Disposal of Documents which are not of sufficient value to justify their Preservation in the Public Record Office,'" section 7, 890, 3. The three inspecting officers included the deputy keeper of the records, one assistant record keeper, and one other officer (who was required to be a "barrister of seven years' standing," if neither of the record keepers met that requirement).The inspecting officers were required to produce at least one schedule per year of records proposed for disposal, in conjunction with departmental officials.There were, however, no instructions given as to how the "legal, historical, genealogical, or antiquarian use or interest" for records was to be determined.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle