MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2172803339

Provenance and paleodrainage of Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous reservoir sandstones in the Flemish Pass and Orphan Basins

2009· dissertation· en· W2172803339 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David G. Lowe

Notice bibliographique

RevueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2009
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological formations and processes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyProvenancePetrographyDetritusHeavy mineralGeochemistryRiftZirconSedimentary rockPaleontologySiliciclasticBasementDevonianGeochronologyPaleozoicPetrologySedimentary depositional environmentTectonicsStructural basin
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous potential reservoir sandstones from three industry exploratory wells in the Flemish Pass and Orphan Basins were studied for provenance analysis. The sandstones from this study formed during intracratonic rifting that preceded the breakup between North America and its European conjugate margins and seafloor spreading in the North Atlantic. Most were deposited during the Tithonian and Neocomian North Atlantic Rifting stage, during which rifting intensified between Iberia and the Grand Banks and the deposition of important reservoir sandstones occurred regionally. -- Heavy mineral fractions were isolated from cuttings samples from six syn-rift sandstone units. The studied sandstones range in age from Tithonian to Albian. Three heavy mineral approaches were used to determine provenance and make correlations: (1) U-Pb geochronology and petrography of detrital zircons, (2) detrital heavy mineral grain counts and ratios, and (3) geochemistry of detrital tourmalines. -- Based mainly on detrital zircon ages and petrography and detrital tourmaline geochemistry, the predominant first-cycle sediment sources included the Neoproterozoic arc-phase igneous rocks of the Avalon Zone as well as the Ordovician to Devonian magmatic rocks and metasedimentary rocks present in the Central Mobile Belt. There is abundant petrographic and heavy mineral evidence to support significant recycling of material from cover sequences in these tectonic zones as well, likely including Early and Late Paleozoic sedimentary rocks which are ubiquitous in both zones. -- Such a source signature requires uplifted source areas to be present in the west, including parts of the Bonavista Platform, Interior Newfoundland, Northeastern Newfoundland Shelf, and potentially parts of the Irish conjugate margin, including the Porcupine Bank. Thus, paleodrainage orientations and delivery of coarse clastic detritus into the Flemish Pass and Orphan Basins was predominantly from the west during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, as seafloor spreading began between the Grand Banks and Iberia. Based on this information, one would expect to find reservoir facies sandstone units of this age concentrated along the western margins of the Flemish Pass and Orphan Basins, with deteriorating reservoir grade towards the east. -- A number of the studied sandstones in the Flemish Pass Basin show evidence for partial sourcing from the south, including proximal sources and distal sources as far south as the Avalon Uplift; verifying previous ideas that the Avalon Uplift existed as a significant positive regional tectonic element as incipient seafloor spreading began between Iberia and the Grand Banks. There is no evidence to support sourcing from the east, off of the Iberian margin or the Flemish Cap-Galicia Bank continental fragment, and material from these areas is instead interpreted to have been shed into the incipient Atlantic Ocean or Bay of Biscay. -- Mesozoic aged detrital zircons were present in two samples, and proved useful for constraining the depositional age of these sandstones. The most likely known sources of these grains include the Budgell Harbour Stock, in Central Newfoundland, or an Early Cretaceous granite basement intercepted by the Bonavista C-99 well in the West Orphan Basin. Both of these potential sources are located to the west of the studied units.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,245
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,868

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Même sujetGeological formations and processesTravaux en français237 207