Conference Reflection: On Blindness, the Nature of Elephants, and Educational Research
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Adapted from ‘The Blind Men and the Elephant’ John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887) Once there were some scholars, to learning much inclined, Who went to see the Elephant (all of them were blind) So each by observation, might satisfy their mind. The first approached the elephant, and, happening to fall, Against a broad and sturdy side, at once began to bawl: ‘The elephant, it seems, is nothing but a wall!’ Another, feeling a tusk, cried: ‘What have we here? (To me it is both reliable and clear) This wonder of an elephant is very like a spear!’ A third approached the animal (now wily and awake) Then happening (by grounded chance) to take, Trunk in hand, cried ‘the elephant is a snake!’ Then a fourth reached for, and felt about the knee (Having paid a substantial entrance fee) Then proudly declared that the elephant was a tree. A fifth, now touching an ear (weathered and tan), States ‘what this resembles is clear to the blindest of man, The marvel of the elephant is very much like a fan!’ The sixth no sooner had begun about the beast to grope, Then seizing the tail, that fell within his scope, Said finally, ‘the elephant is a rope!’ And so the scholars, inquired loud and long, Each with opinion exceeding and strong, Though each was in the right, still all were in the wrong! An Invitation to Meet the Elephant The Eastern Cape of South Africa has much to offer. It has popular activities, married with opportunities to interact with people and wildlife of many persuasions. So, when the invitation to participate in the 8th International Invitational Research and Development Seminar on Environmental and Health Education came, it was quite impossible to refuse. Port Elizabeth, said the website: ‘beckons with an attractive atmosphere of year-round holiday fun against a backdrop of urban activity … leisure options encompass a wide range’. Of course, this is only a small and distorted picture of what the Eastern Cape represents to the local inhabitants. So, I had to acknowledge that for now (as some kind of Canadian snowbird) I was going to be coming in ‘blind’ and I hoped that there would be some reliable guides on hand when I arrived. The tourist website went on to describe parks, botanical gardens, nature reserves and an abundance of wildlife. It notes that in Port Elizabeth, the ‘1820 Settlers’ were introduced to their new land, and there they built some of the graceful homes that still enhance the city’s landscape; it is also related that the settlers’ trail eventually extended north from here and travelled through Grahamstown (our eventual destination). Of great interest (and also nearby to Port Elizabeth) is the Addo Elephant National Park which is said to support about 350 elephants, in addition to Cape buffalo, black rhino, kudu and over 180 bird species. Keenly, I was anticipating the possibility of a chance meeting with some elephants during this, my second visit to the Eastern Cape.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,038 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,018 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,021 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,026 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,018 | 0,034 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,042 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».